CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 493 résultats pour « Alexandre BECAUD »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112DEC000334306

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2013

12 novembre 2013

see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 12   November 2013 as a Committee composed of: Elisabeth Steiner, President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Linos-Alexandre

Page 32 sur 75

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212JUD004497104

Admin. suprême

12 février 2013

12 février 2013

European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD007365910

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

It appears that all her claims were rejected, either for want of substantive jurisdiction over the dispute, or because the courts had found her claims unsubstantiated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605DEC006272610

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2012

5 juin 2012

on 5   June   2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Nina Vajić,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004DEC000097111

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2011

4 octobre 2011

No appeal was lodged against this decision and it became final. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205DEC002105611

Admin. suprême

5 février 2013

5 février 2013

    The applicant responded that his complaints to the Ombudsman and to the regional prosecutor had been fruitless because they had not reviewed his arguments, heard his submissions, examined

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC002282006

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

2013 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1214JUD000143402

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2006

14 décembre 2006

    Following a further purchase of shares in the estate, Nicolae Lupaş became the owner of 264/360 of the property, which was now owned in common with eleven other heirs. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD001840710

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2013

19 décembre 2013

Yegor R. was convinced that he had been followed by the FSB since 2009 and that he could not find work because of FSB involvement.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704JUD006966116

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2024

4 juillet 2024

    As regards the remaining applicants, the Court dismisses the Government’s objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, because they cannot be reproached for not having exhausted the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113JUD003234704

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2007

13 novembre 2007

Becciu (“the applicant”), on 4   August 2004. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1218REP001057283

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 1987

18 décembre 1987

  The Federal Court of Justice considered it to be in breach of honest practices because, in its view, the disclosure of the relevant facts was not warranted by the circumstances.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2619792-2854756

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2009

30 janvier 2009

Romania (no. 30699/02) The applicant, Emilia Marilena Marin, is a Romanian national who was born in 1947 and lives in Alexandria (Romania).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD003346803

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

    The Government claimed, for the first time in their additional observations in reply to those by the applicants, that the applicants had not exhausted domestic remedies, because they had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0129JUD001571113

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2015

29 janvier 2015

    As to non-pecuniary damage, the applicant claimed 40,000 euros (EUR), referring to the anxiety and stress she was enduring because of the imminent loss of her home.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1218JUD002543506

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2014

18 décembre 2014

Her condition became worse, so the next morning she was taken to the town hospital, accompanied by her parents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1008JUD002803212

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2020

8 octobre 2020

North Macedonia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Ksenija Turković, President,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Aleš Pejchal,  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0105DEC005233512

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2016

5 janvier 2016

    The prosecution subsequently became aware of the value of the applicant’s equity in the business.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0531DEC002241005

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2011

31 mai 2011

However, at present these rights could not be executed because of the entry into force of the Fisheries Act 1932. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1031DEC003671797

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 1997

31 octobre 1997

       In the proceedings before the Commission he is represented by Mr Alexander Munz, a lawyer practising in Hamburg.

Source officielle