The court considered that the applicant did not make a plausible case for believing that, upon return, he would run a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention.

There are also a number of handwritten notes, dates and signatures on the document which make it clear that it was sent to, and received by, the Moscow City Court. 24.

The Government alleged that, at the time, the property was in a bad state of repair and that the third party had borne the expenses to make it habitable. 7.

In the case of Valentino Acatrinei v.

that none of its members has the authority to note ( calitatea sǎ constate ) any “injustice, irregularity or illegality committed by the judges” because it is only the State authorities appointed to make

The domestic courts had not made an assessment of proportionality while examining his case.

(see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

This conclusion makes it unnecessary to ascertain whether the other requirements of that provision have been complied with.

The possibility of the increase in rent was only made possible by means of a new procedure introduced by Act XXVII in 2018.

However, the CPT’s report on the latter visit has not been made public. The last report of the CPT concerning Azerbaijan which has been made public is about its visit in December 2008.

He could have reasonably been expected to make some enquiries into this matter before setting out on a journey.

Furthermore, the Court noted that a prosecutor was present at the appeal hearing and made oral submissions to the court.

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

Although possible, X did not make use of an appeal on points of law to the Supreme Court. Criminal proceedings concerning the demolition 20 .

account the nature and purpose of the crimes committed by the defendant on behalf of the armed criminal organisation and the way in which the crimes were committed, in accordance with the amendment made

No minutes of those interviews were made. According to the applicants, they were taken to two separate rooms.

applications, and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the other complaints mentioned above (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Germany , 6 September 1978, § 33, Series A no. 28, and Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.   Romania   [GC], no.   47848/08, §   101, ECHR 2014). 28 .

OTHER COMPLAINTS Some applicants made accessory complaints referring to assorted Articles of the Convention.