must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what

  25079/24, the Court notes that the applicant died on 29 March 2025, while the case was pending before the Court.

This destabilised B who then tended to lie and selectively to choose what was more comfortable. 18.

    In accordance with those principles, while the right to bring an action is of course subject to statutory requirements, the courts are bound to apply the rules of procedure avoiding both

The defendants were confronted with a stark but clear choice: either they could help the police in the knowledge that what they said may be utilised against them, or they could protect themselves and remain

  In a statement to the Bingöl Public Prosecutor dated 9 February 1995, the applicant complained about his ill-treatment while in detention and alleged that he had been suspended by the arms, although

The court indicated that the cumulative sentence would start to run from 29   March 2002, the date of commission of the second offence. It was due to expire on 29   September 2015. 9.

It entered into force on 1   December 1999 in respect of the States that had ratified it.

The time-limit shall, however, start on the first subsequent day. ... (3) If the last day of a time-limit falls on a national holiday or on a Sunday or on any other day when the court is not open, such

adopted on 9   October 2003, states as follows: “22.

       It follows from the applicants' statements and the documents submitted that the first applicant's marriage was dissolved by divorce judgment given on 5 July 1990 by the

Did the Chief Constable know about the taxi driver’s statement, when he made this statement?

Her new statement does not seem credible. She has strong personal reasons for trying to save the family’s financial situation.

That action had been prompted by the applicant’s aggressive behaviour while in a state of intoxication and his abnormally antisocial personality. 12.

    The information before the Court indicates that in summer 2013 Judge G.V. submitted a letter of resignation to the State President, but later withdrew it.

    Had it been decisive for the outcome of this appeal, I would have considered that, in the present unsatisfactory state of the Strasbourg case law, the Grand Chamber statements on article

The fact that A. revealed what had happened only in November 2007, whereas the incident is supposed to have occurred during the summer break of 2007, could be held against the credibility of her statements

G. and T. were sentenced to prison sentences of five years and ten months and two years and nine months respectively, while E. was sentenced to a suspended prison sentence of one year and ten months.

    The other three suspects, C.A., M.Ö. and T.S., gave similar statements to that of B.Y.’s. 9.