5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Published on 12 April 2021   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 56741/18 Robert BLAZHESKI and Others against North Macedonia lodged on 26 November 2018 communicated on 23 March

In March 2003 the Supreme Court ruled that the prosecution was not time-barred. Upholding the trial court’s findings as to the applicants’ guilt, it imposed prison sentences on them.

This judgment was appealed against to the Supreme Court, which upheld the Court of Appeal’s findings by a judgment of 20 December 2018.

The Commission’s task is limited to documentary fact-finding and its decisions are purely declaratory.

By a judgment of 29 November 2017 the Brașov Regional Court acquitted the applicant of the first offense after finding the evidence adduced by the prosecutor insufficient to warrant a conviction.

In March 2001 the President of the National Assembly stripped the applicant of her status as member of Parliament, as the decision depriving her of Turkish nationality had become final.

So far as the subject matter of the present application is concerned, the term of the applicant’s detention was authorised until 14 March 2008. 4.

In fact, the Court itself has temporal jurisdiction to entertain complaints against the Slovak Republic only to the extent that they concern facts subsequent to 18 March 1992, and the finding of 9 April

  The Court accepted the facts found by the Commission, following a fact-finding mission in Turkey.

2023 the Constitutional Court considered that, in the absence of an appeal about the merits it was limited in its findings.

On 6 March 2006 the Moscow City Court upheld the judgment on appeal. 2.

Its findings were endorsed by the appeal court.

    On 14 March 2003 J.-L. Lagardère died. 14.

However, that hearing was adjourned by the court of its own motion to 4 March 1999.

RUSSIA (Applications nos. 12120/20 and 2 others – see appended list)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 29 March 2022   This judgment is final but it may be subject

On 21 December 2010 the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow dismissed his claim, finding that the prosecutors had accurately reported the findings contained in the Regional Court’s judgment of 2 March 2010

    On various dates in March and April 2013 the Baku Court of Appeal dismissed the applicants’ appeals, finding that the detention orders were justified.

On 31 March 2008 the Zagreb Municipal Court again dismissed the applicant’s claim as statute-barred.

margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } Resolution ResDH(2003)166 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 March