breached his right to a fair trial as provided in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing

They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which provides, insofar as relevant, as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    During a hearing before the Court of Serious Crimes, Z.Y. denied the charges, in particular that of forming an organised group.

The relevant part of Article 6 § 1 reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ...”

    On 22   June 2011 the Desnyanskyi District Court of Kyiv examined the applicant’s request that her pension be recalculated at a public hearing in which the applicant participated, and

On hearing the news, Mr V.N. took his car and drove Mr M.M. junior and Mr D.M. to the crime scene, without mentioning that he had witnessed the murder, or that he knew anything about it.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    The applicants complained principally that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ refusal of their requests to appear in court.

Before the main proceedings in a case, the Supreme Court may hold hearings to decide on procedural matters. The parties shall be notified of such hearing with reasonable notice.” Section 205 “...

    The applicants relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention to claim a violation of their right to a fair hearing, arguing that the reasoning of the court’s judgments was contradictory, and

of the hearing (see Salogub v.

    The applicants complained that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ refusal of their requests to appear in court.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Therefore, he requested the hearing of the responsible person of the Slovenian Roads Agency.

xa0; The case concerns the reversal of a judgment of a first instance court by which the applicant was cleared of criminal charges and his conviction on appeal without examining anew any evidence or hearing

cases, violating the duty to protect the secrecy of proceedings established by law, when the public has been excluded in accordance with the law; 4)   without justified reasons, does not schedule hearings

According to the applicant, his chosen representative never received a summons for this hearing.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)