Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD005690310
17 décembre 2020
17 décembre 2020
They stressed that the plot of land was adjacent to the neighbouring building and that the decision to allocate the plot of land to the applicant company for construction purpose had been adopted without
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-142472
18 mars 2014
18 mars 2014
They jointly owned two plots of arable land in the village measuring 0.373 ha and 0.448 ha. They also owned a beekeeper’s house measuring 69.4 sq.m situated on the second plot of land.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0926DEC001665490
26 septembre 2002
26 septembre 2002
Sh / Pl 33/37, Plot no. 680, Description: Plot of Land (field), Use: ? , Share: Whole Applicant no. 22 - Niki PAVLIDOU 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121DEC006435114
21 novembre 2024
21 novembre 2024
Once those judgments had been adopted, the plot of land in question was no longer registered in the applicant’s name.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524JUD001668290
24 mai 2011
24 mai 2011
This plot was registered in the name of a company, Georgike Epichrisis Kalisperas Ltd. 7.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328DEC003002103
28 mars 2006
28 mars 2006
As to plot of land no. 210/2 (...) the Prague-West District Court decided (...) that Mr B. is the owner of one half of this plot.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118713
18 mars 2013
18 mars 2013
A different ruling was therefore made as regards plot no. 10624 and as regards the remaining plots. 11.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC003195205
2 novembre 2010
2 novembre 2010
In 1991 and 1992 the applicant requested restitution from the local land commission of several plots of land in different localities, among which a plot of 7.32 hectares (“ha”) located in the village of
Source officielleMagistrat M. TAORMINA
DTA_2204090_20230531
31 mai 2023
31 mai 2023
concernant l'installation en cause ; ses dernières visites ont été faites les 10 décembre 2021 et 23 mars 2022 ; - le fait que le plot se soit relevé au passage de M.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225055
4 mai 2023
4 mai 2023
belonging to the applicants because of allegedly unlawful actions of third parties giving those land plots to the applicants.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188765
29 novembre 2018
29 novembre 2018
On 22 June 2016 the Moscow City Court found that the Administration had incorrectly determined the category of land to which the plot pertained.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145133
26 mai 2014
26 mai 2014
The head of the agency issued another order on 11 February 2011, indicating that ownership of the applicants’ plot was contested.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0413DEC005416815
13 avril 2023
13 avril 2023
In June 2005 the Prague Metropolitan Office initiated proceedings for approval of a construction on the plot of land.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD003544213
23 octobre 2025
23 octobre 2025
It held that the lower court’s finding that the 2001 and 2004 decisions had not specified the location of the plots of land had been wrong: as confirmed by technical documents, the plots allocated to the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217DEC003629408
17 décembre 2013
17 décembre 2013
On 1 December 1980 the plot of land was owned by a people’s enterprise ( volkseigener Betrieb , VEB).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330DEC000078703
30 mars 2010
30 mars 2010
The applicants are the owners of a plot of land of 40,000 square metres (plot no. 227) in Nenehatun village, Erzurum.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1216JUD005248210
16 décembre 2021
16 décembre 2021
(“the Regulations”) (see paragraphs 14-15 above), to privatise the plot of land in question.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0615DEC003709597
15 juin 1999
15 juin 1999
The first applicant became the owner of 83% of the plot and the second applicant of the rest.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212JUD003162015
12 décembre 2023
12 décembre 2023
Former plot no. 100 was divided into three plots including plots nos. 2943/3 and 2943/6, and former plot no. 126 was divided into plots nos. 2940/1 and 2943/1. 6.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329JUD003394905
29 mars 2011
29 mars 2011
The applicants submitted that the first plot located in Dąbki did not correspond to the value or the attractiveness of their plot.
Source officiellePage 30 sur 918