xa0;    Application No. 13535/88                       by Catharina Geertruida Maria

Kingdom   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 11   April   2023 as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda, President ,   Tim Eicke,   Ana Maria

Frijns and Mr   Chretien Henri Joseph Maria Frijns are brothers and live in Bemelen.

    The first and second applicant married in 1994. In 1996, their first daughter, the third applicant, was born.

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Helen Keller, President,   María Elósegui,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Olga

Furthermore, the applicants were released from prison or were transferred to detention facilities they did not complain about.

CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Reims, 4 mai 2006), qu'un jugement rendu par un juge aux affaires familiales a dit

. – 77200 TORCY Madame Maria Elena E... épouse D... demeurant... – 77200 TORCY Monsieur Jean-Jacques F... demeurant... – 13720 BELCODENE Madame Linda G... épouse F...

November 2013 requesting the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases and the applicant’s reply to that declaration, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Ms Maria

They live in Nusco and Santa Maria Capua Vetere (Italy), respectively. Mr Della Vecchia was declared bankrupt in 1994 and Mr Di Ieso in 1979.

CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu que Guido X... est décédé le 17 décembre 1993, en laissant pour lui succéder son épouse commune en biens, Mme Clara Y..., et ses quatre enfants, Anna-Maria

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le dix mai mil neuf cent quatre vingt treize, a rendu l'arrêt suivant

Ainsi, l'action de la SA DIAC n’est pas forclose et est recevable.

Maria, a lawyer practising in Coimbra; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

The court considered that Article 16 of Law no. 10/2001 did not apply to property which had been nationalized without a valid title, such as in the applicant’s case. 9.

On 25 July 1997 the Court of Cassation considered that the 1994 law simply interpreted the 1989 ministerial decision, did not have the purpose of resolving the litigation and did not interfere with the

  11208/02) out of the Court's list of cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Ms Maria Idzik, is a Polish national who was born in 1922 and lives in Opole. A.

Maruste ,   Mr   S. Pavlovschi ,   Mr   L. Garlicki,   Mr   J. Borrego Borrego, judges , and     Mrs     F.