CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-213546
25 octobre 2021
The Orenburg Regional Court upheld that finding on appeal on 17 March 2016. The appeal judgment was received by the applicant on 7 April 2016.
Page 30 sur 1230
ECLI:CEDH:001-235980
30 août 2024
In August 2018 the applicant complained to the prosecutor of having been beaten, in March 2018, by X and Y in an attempt to kill her.
ECLI:CEDH:001-242694
14 mars 2025
2025 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 42069/22 Adriaan ANDREA against the Netherlands lodged on 18 August 2022 communicated on 14 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns alleged medical
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109767
8 mars 2012
Resolution CM/ResDH(2012)25 [1] Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights A.J.P. against France (Application No. 17020/05, judgment of 29 October 2009, final on 1 March
ECLI:CEDH:001-242617
6 mars 2025
2025 SECOND SECTION Application no. 42938/23 Anita SHOJLEVA against North Macedonia lodged on 5 December 2023 communicated on 6 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns non-enforcement
ECLI:CEDH:001-172237
23 février 2017
s Non-Return Advisory for South Sudanese fleeing the conflict and Regional Emergency Update for South Sudan of 21 ‑ 28 August 2016 [1] , does the current situation in South Sudan justify the finding
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0113JUD007077712
13 janvier 2022
2011) disciplined in the light of the prosecutor’s findings.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116JUD004411598
16 janvier 2007
On 10 March 1997 the Wrocław Appellate Prosecutor dismissed the appeal, finding that the evidence gathered so far in the case, as well as the nature of the offences concerned, justified his continuing
ECLI:CEDH:001-169762
23 novembre 2016
The strip-search of 22 March 2012 On 22 March 2012 the applicant was going to be transferred to court for a hearing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409JUD004906820
9 avril 2026
The President approved the extradition on 20 March 2019.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0517JUD007445601
17 mai 2005
Enforcement proceedings brought on 1 March 2000 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0326JUD002488803
26 mars 2020
89 of 24 March 2001, known as the “Pinto” Act, complaining of the excessive length of the above-described proceedings.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0118DEC002484994
18 janvier 2000
The court also pointed out that it was likely that the findings in the medical report dated 30 March 1994 could be explained by factors other than ill-treatment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0403DEC002945302
3 avril 2007
The findings of the Regional Court did not constitute any findings of guilt and thus did not breach the presumption of innocence. The applicant contested this view.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1130DEC005003499
30 novembre 2000
“In the overall result we have to allow this appeal and quash the findings of racial discrimination made by the Tribunal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0202DEC002156003
2 février 2007
On an unspecified date the applicant filed a cassation appeal against the judgment of the Sofia Regional Court arguing that its findings were unsubstantiated.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9843
25 mars 1992
March 1992 Campbell v. the United Kingdom - 13590/88 Judgment 25.3.1992 Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for correspondence Control by prison authorities in Scotland of a prisoner's correspondence to and
ECLI:CEDH:001-170237
7 décembre 2016
On 1 March 2007 the Varna Regional Court dismissed his request, finding that it was time-barred due to the expiry of the year-long limitation period counting from the child’s birth.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12359
14 mars 2019
Latvia - 35726/10 Judgment 14.3.2019 [Section V] Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Finding of guilt for repeat offence while appeal against original offence still pending: violation Facts
ECLI:CEDH:001-249947
31 mars 2026
A second medical report drawn up on the following day repeated the findings of the first report and noted no new signs of battery or assault.