CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

24 588 résultats pour « Marc FINKINE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-213546

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2021

25 octobre 2021

The Orenburg Regional Court upheld that finding on appeal on 17 March 2016. The appeal judgment was received by the applicant on 7 April 2016.

Source officielle

Page 30 sur 1230

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-235980

Admin. suprême

30 août 2024

30 août 2024

In August 2018 the applicant complained to the prosecutor of having been beaten, in March 2018, by X and Y in an attempt to kill her.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242694

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2025

14 mars 2025

2025   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 42069/22 Adriaan ANDREA against the Netherlands lodged on 18 August 2022 communicated on 14 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns alleged medical

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-109767

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2012

8 mars 2012

Resolution CM/ResDH(2012)25 [1]   Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights A.J.P. against France   (Application No. 17020/05, judgment of 29 October 2009, final on 1 March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242617

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2025

6 mars 2025

2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 42938/23 Anita SHOJLEVA against North Macedonia lodged on 5 December 2023 communicated on 6 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns non-enforcement

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172237

Admin. suprême

23 février 2017

23 février 2017

s Non-Return Advisory for South Sudanese fleeing the conflict and Regional Emergency Update for South Sudan of 21 ‑ 28 August 2016 [1] , does the current situation in South Sudan justify the finding

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0113JUD007077712

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2022

13 janvier 2022

2011) disciplined in the light of the prosecutor’s findings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116JUD004411598

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2007

16 janvier 2007

On 10 March 1997 the Wrocław Appellate Prosecutor dismissed the appeal, finding that the evidence gathered so far in the case, as well as the nature of the offences concerned, justified his continuing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169762

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2016

23 novembre 2016

    The strip-search of 22 March 2012 On 22 March 2012 the applicant was going to be transferred to court for a hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0409JUD004906820

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2026

9 avril 2026

The President approved the extradition on 20 March 2019.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0517JUD007445601

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2005

17 mai 2005

    Enforcement proceedings brought on 1 March 2000 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0326JUD002488803

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2020

26 mars 2020

  89 of 24   March   2001, known as the “Pinto” Act, complaining of the excessive length of the above-described proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0118DEC002484994

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2000

18 janvier 2000

The court also pointed out that it was likely that the findings in the medical report dated 30 March 1994 could be explained by factors other than ill-treatment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0403DEC002945302

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2007

3 avril 2007

The findings of the Regional Court did not constitute any findings of guilt and thus did not breach the presumption of innocence. The applicant contested this view.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1130DEC005003499

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2000

30 novembre 2000

“In the overall result we have to allow this appeal and quash the findings of racial discrimination made by the Tribunal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0202DEC002156003

Admin. suprême

2 février 2007

2 février 2007

On an unspecified date the applicant filed a cassation appeal against the judgment of the Sofia Regional Court arguing that its findings were unsubstantiated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9843

Admin. suprême

25 mars 1992

25 mars 1992

March 1992 Campbell v. the United Kingdom - 13590/88 Judgment 25.3.1992 Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for correspondence Control by prison authorities in Scotland of a prisoner's correspondence to and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-170237

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2016

7 décembre 2016

On 1   March 2007 the Varna Regional Court dismissed his request, finding that it was time-barred due to the expiry of the year-long limitation period counting from the child’s birth.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12359

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2019

14 mars 2019

Latvia - 35726/10 Judgment 14.3.2019 [Section V] Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Finding of guilt for repeat offence while appeal against original offence still pending: violation Facts

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249947

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2026

31 mars 2026

A second medical report drawn up on the following day repeated the findings of the first report and noted no new signs of battery or assault.

Source officielle