Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

  At the hearing on 6   June 1995, the applicant was represented by Advocate Perrot.   The Royal Court sat as a full court and was presided over by the Bailiff.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    According to the transcript of the court hearing on 18 March 2008, the applicant’s representative stated during the hearing that the applicant had lodged the statement of intent on 25  

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

The other parties participated in the hearing. The Supreme Court upheld the appeal and reversed the judgment of the lower court.

She relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which provides, insofar as relevant, as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing

They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ...” A.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Public hearing)

    On 14 February 2000 the trial court held the first hearing in the absence of the applicant.

Supreme Court may decide to: a) uphold the judgment; b) quash the appeal court’s judgment and uphold the first-instance court’s judgment; c) quash the appeal court’s judgment and remit the case for re-hearing

    The applicants complained principally that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ refusal of their requests to appear in court.

On 14 May 2013 the Istanbul Assize Court, after conducting twelve hearings, decided to uphold the applicant’s previous conviction under Article 146 of the former Criminal Code and his sentence to life

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

  296/2006 had violated his right to a fair hearing under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and constituted an unjustified interference with his possessions, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1

On the same day, after hearing the applicant, the investigating judge heard the victim, L.V.Š., as a witness.

It asserted that the applicant had in fact failed to lodge a motion to have re-examined witnesses against him and referred, in that regard, to the minutes of one of the hearings held before that court.