CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 166 résultats pour « Alexandre SHI »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0914JUD004121514

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2017

14 septembre 2017

Although she accepted that the applicant had family ties in the United Kingdom with his mother, father, brother and sister, in the absence of further elements of dependency she found that these ties did

Page 30 sur 59

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0507JUD001371211

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2015

7 mai 2015

She also explained that she was unemployed and that this situation had affected the applicants, who were no longer doing so well at school.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0328JUD001019508

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2013

28 mars 2013

    he or she attempts to escape; 2.     he or she has not been identified; 3.     he or she may continue to commit criminal offences; 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0706JUD001298613

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2017

6 juillet 2017

She said that she had not witnessed the arrest of her former husband and sons but had heard from D.F.T., wife of her son Z.T., about it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515JUD001656710

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2012

15 mai 2012

Regarding the second applicant, it was stated that she had earlier attempted suicide and that she showed clear signs of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0315JUD004327898

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2007

15 mars 2007

She received them on 21 April 2003. 33.     The applicant sold her bonds in instalments.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167658

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2016

19 septembre 2016

    The headline is an allusion to Alexander Pushkin’s The Tale of the Fisherman and the Fish where an old man catches a magical golden fish that can grant three wishes.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD001609190

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2010

26 octobre 2010

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD001205004

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2009

8 janvier 2009

This Directive shall apply to discharges of polluting substances from any ship, irrespective of its flag, with the exception of any warship, naval auxiliary or other ship owned or operated by a State and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0619JUD000159306

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2012

19 juin 2012

She is a family judge and has never in her 20-year career seen such a case.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2699969-2960825

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2009

17 avril 2009

Romania (no. 70787/01) The applicant, Ion Răducu, was a Romanian national who was born in 1939 and lived in Alexandria (Romania).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001901007

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

[She] shares a home in ... with her partner ... (the first applicant) and with ... (the second applicant).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD005915208

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2017

28 novembre 2017

    Applicant’s detention in Alexandru Obregia and Poiana Mare Psychiatric Hospitals 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116854

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2013

30 janvier 2013

She had learnt about his detention in the Gudermes ROVD on the fourth day after his arrest. When she had seen the first applicant herself, he had had burns on his hands and legs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0719JUD002555307

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2011

19 juillet 2011

The applicant stated that on 1   August 2003 she and her husband had been away from their house.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2016

30 mars 2016

She was based in control room 1600, where she was supported by Trojan 80, an experienced SFO from SO19 who was acting as her tactical adviser. 20.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1017JUD002682404

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2013

17 octobre 2013

She stated that she had witnessed the incident on 16   September   2000: “...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD004008114

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2015

15 octobre 2015

    The applicants’ representative confirmed that she had not been aware of A.A.’s escape prior to the meeting with the two other applicants on 17   December 2014 and submitted that she

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131JUD007810314

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2019

31 janvier 2019

Under Article 6 she also complained about the length of the civil proceedings she had instigated against the hospital. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0618JUD007159311

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2015

18 juin 2015

Article 243 “(1) If a properly summoned witness does not appear and does not offer a good reason for his or her absence, or if he or she leaves the place where he or she is to give his or her evidence

Source officielle