Furthermore, she had been told that she could not report anything because there were reporting restrictions in place.

    On 20 August 2009 the applicant’s sentence was reduced to thirteen years and four months’ imprisonment because of changes in the criminal law. 3.

She did not complain about her detention from 22 July 2010 until her release on 6 July 2011, presumably because this period was not considered by the domestic courts.

T. had dismissed S.’s requests to meet the applicant because T. had owed USD   1,000 to the applicant and had not wanted to see him.

    The applicant did not agree that his comments had been harmful to the judiciary, because he had raised them only internally.

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that he did not receive a fair trial because of a violation of his defence rights. 4.

It is impossible to determine whether [the applicant] had sustained any injuries on 9 November 2005 because no injuries or traces of injuries inflicted on that day have been observed during the forensic

In addition, food in the canteen often went bad because the refrigerators did not work well. There was only one toilet in the cell, which was not sufficient for eight persons.

    On 31 March 2004 the same daily published an article entitled “Removed because of a non-existent ‘judgment’ [ Smijenjen zbog nepostojeće presude ]?”

Mrs Đorđević told Dalibor to come inside because she knew how afraid he was of them. They said that he did not need to be afraid because they would soon leave.

At the same time, the court decided to wait until the partial judgment became final before examining the applicant’s claim for salary arrears.

    On 28 February 2006 the Administrative Court discontinued the proceedings because the Constitutional Court had already quashed the decision. 14.

The tariff expired on 18 April 2004 and he became eligible for parole. 7 .

on 5   June   2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

xa0; February 2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Nina Vajić,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

6   November   2012 as a Chamber composed of: Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Nina Vajić,   Anatoly Kovler,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

His mother, J.S., had told him that Ljuban had died a natural death because he had not received his medication.

Because of those errors the complainants had sustained serious bodily injuries: notably the applicant had descending organs with an attendant risk of prolapse.

The provisional measure was to remain in effect until the judgment in the main proceedings became final or until further order of the court. 10.