CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011JUD003744497
11 octobre 2005
Accordingly, his detention has its basis under Article 217 § 1(1) and § 2. In the present case there is a need to take various evidence, in particular from witnesses.
Page 3 sur 8583
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1204DEC003205696
4 décembre 2001
Article 217 § 1 defined grounds for detention on remand. The relevant part of this provision, in the version applicable until 1 January 1996, provided: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0906DEC001081602
6 septembre 2005
Article 217 § 1 of the Code, in the version after 1 January 1996, provided insofar as relevant: “Detention on remand may be imposed if: (1) there is a reasonable risk that an accused
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0604DEC003764197
4 juin 2002
The court referred to the gravity of the charges against the applicant and the grounds for detention provided in Article 217 §§ 1 and 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130DEC004767209
30 novembre 2010
Article 217 § 1 reads, in so far as relevant: “... a detainee’s correspondence shall be censored by [the authority at whose disposal he remains], unless the authority decides otherwise.”
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327DEC001848006
27 mars 2012
Invoquant l’article 5 §§ 1 et 3 de la Convention, le requérant se plaint du caractère infondé et de la durée de sa détention provisoire. 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1116DEC003547697
16 novembre 2000
Article 217 of the Code defined grounds for detention on remand. The relevant part of this provision, in the version applicable until 1 January 1996, read: "1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1203JUD003021896
3 décembre 2002
The court decided that she would be detained on remand under Article 217 § 1(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0912DEC003343816
12 septembre 2017
The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that an investigation cannot be open against an unknown perpetrator (Article 217 § 1) but there is a possibility of conducting certain investigative
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1206JUD006390500
6 décembre 2005
Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112DEC004208398
12 novembre 2002
Article 214 § 1 “Unless exceptions are provided for in the present Chapter, a detainee shall enjoy at least the same rights as are secured to a convicted person serving a sentence of imprisonment under
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0201JUD003182006
1 février 2011
The Court observes that the contested measure was applied under Article 217§ 1 of the Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1018DEC000465702
18 octobre 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1018DEC002375503
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0913DEC006701601
13 septembre 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112DEC003422196
Article 217 § 1 defined grounds for detention on remand.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617DEC005189599
17 juin 2003
On 28 October 1997 the Lublin Regional Court ordered, under Article 211 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1969 (“the 1969 Code”), that the applicant be kept in detention pending trial
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0519DEC002929302
19 mai 2005
Article 249 § 1 sets out the general grounds for imposition of the preventive measures. That provision reads: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1017DEC004436902
17 octobre 2006
Article 217 § 1 reads, in so far as relevant, as follows: “(...) detainee’s correspondence shall be censored by [the organ at whose disposal he remains], unless the organ decides otherwise.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0306DEC003959898
6 mars 2003
Article 217 § 1 defined grounds for detention on remand. The relevant part of this provision provided: “1.