CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

3 861 résultats pour « Stuart White »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1605795-1685384

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2006

7 mars 2006

policy of the Act was to ensure continuing consent from the start of treatment to the point of implantation in the woman.

Source officielle

Page 3 sur 194

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0220DEC006071514

Admin. suprême

20 février 2018

20 février 2018

This week we were forced to see what we don’t want to see ...”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221841

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2022

23 novembre 2022

While the non-communicated observations of the Orašje Municipal Court did not contain anything new or relevant to the case, the Prosecutor’s Office submitted arguments on which the Constitutional Court

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2944747-3239521

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2009

9 décembre 2009

While initially she feared an ectopic pregnancy, she was aware it was not prior to travelling to the UK for an abortion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216617

Admin. suprême

28 février 2022

28 février 2022

Once again, these claims were based on their statements and on statements of their companies and employees, and were not substantiated by further evidence, such as entries in the companies’ accounting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115711

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2010

7 décembre 2010

Subsequently, a Mr P. formally acknowledged the paternity of the girl while his wife adopted her, both with the mother consenting. This arrangement was endorsed by the Gyomaendrőd Custody Board.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1022JUD003555312

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2018

22 octobre 2018

While standing outside with this friend, and talking on the phone with another friend from Copenhagen, he had been detained.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0430JUD006759314

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2025

30 avril 2025

    The case concerns the alleged responsibility of the State for the non-enforcement of a final judgment in the applicants’ favour against private debtors due to a failure of a State agent to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12411

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2019

28 mars 2019

What was in issue was whether the applicant’s detention, which, in effect, had been extended owing to the alteration of the starting date of the applicant’s cumulative sentence, had been “lawful”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD004889899

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2003

6 mai 2003

The article was entitled “Caselli, the judge with the white quiff” and subtitled “Catholic schooling, communist militancy like his friend Violante – Are the charges against Andreotti the start of a new

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD003753713

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2016

12 janvier 2016

    In his statement he said that he regularly drove a white Ford Escort and that he was married to a Thai national.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126513

Admin. suprême

29 août 2013

29 août 2013

The court underlined that the statements of the sole eyewitness were self-contradictory in parts and that they included her personal interpretations of what actually took place on the relevant morning.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618JUD007476810

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2019

18 juin 2019

Photographs reproduce what appear to be some aspects of the same scenes. Red-and-white warning tape is seen on some photographs for the first time. 2.     Incident of 31 May 2010 39 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC003747710

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2018

13 septembre 2018

    The locus standi of Mrs Vira Yuriyevna Shumskaya and Mr   Volodymyr Vasylyovych Shumskyy The Court notes that the applicant died on 26 December 2012, while the case was pending before

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0617DEC000585523

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2025

17 juin 2025

Its name does not reflect this – the name is noble – the State Security Service ... while in reality, nothing endangers our State, nothing corrupts (ხრწნის) it more than we do!

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6442

Admin. suprême

28 août 2012

28 août 2012

The applicant confirmed the statement she had made to the police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-150869

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2015

6 janvier 2015

No such inspection had been carried out by the responsible State authority.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1201DEC004342204

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2009

1 décembre 2009

For example, while it is essential for the efficacy of the system that Contracting States comply with their obligation not to hinder the applicant in the exercise of the right of individual petition, individuals

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-123846

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2013

12 juillet 2013

Three of them, including the applicant, had second-degree invalidity, while the others were under medication. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0424DEC005514821

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2025

24 avril 2025

applicable only after the applicant had lodged the civil action, which was ten months before the start of the proceedings under Law no. 87.

Source officielle