CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1605795-1685384
7 mars 2006
policy of the Act was to ensure continuing consent from the start of treatment to the point of implantation in the woman.
Page 3 sur 194
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0220DEC006071514
20 février 2018
This week we were forced to see what we don’t want to see ...”.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221841
23 novembre 2022
While the non-communicated observations of the Orašje Municipal Court did not contain anything new or relevant to the case, the Prosecutor’s Office submitted arguments on which the Constitutional Court
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2944747-3239521
9 décembre 2009
While initially she feared an ectopic pregnancy, she was aware it was not prior to travelling to the UK for an abortion.
ECLI:CEDH:001-216617
28 février 2022
Once again, these claims were based on their statements and on statements of their companies and employees, and were not substantiated by further evidence, such as entries in the companies’ accounting
ECLI:CEDH:001-115711
7 décembre 2010
Subsequently, a Mr P. formally acknowledged the paternity of the girl while his wife adopted her, both with the mother consenting. This arrangement was endorsed by the Gyomaendrőd Custody Board.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1022JUD003555312
22 octobre 2018
While standing outside with this friend, and talking on the phone with another friend from Copenhagen, he had been detained.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0430JUD006759314
30 avril 2025
The case concerns the alleged responsibility of the State for the non-enforcement of a final judgment in the applicants’ favour against private debtors due to a failure of a State agent to
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12411
28 mars 2019
What was in issue was whether the applicant’s detention, which, in effect, had been extended owing to the alteration of the starting date of the applicant’s cumulative sentence, had been “lawful”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506JUD004889899
6 mai 2003
The article was entitled “Caselli, the judge with the white quiff” and subtitled “Catholic schooling, communist militancy like his friend Violante – Are the charges against Andreotti the start of a new
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD003753713
12 janvier 2016
In his statement he said that he regularly drove a white Ford Escort and that he was married to a Thai national.
ECLI:CEDH:001-126513
29 août 2013
The court underlined that the statements of the sole eyewitness were self-contradictory in parts and that they included her personal interpretations of what actually took place on the relevant morning.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618JUD007476810
18 juin 2019
Photographs reproduce what appear to be some aspects of the same scenes. Red-and-white warning tape is seen on some photographs for the first time. 2. Incident of 31 May 2010 39 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC003747710
13 septembre 2018
The locus standi of Mrs Vira Yuriyevna Shumskaya and Mr Volodymyr Vasylyovych Shumskyy The Court notes that the applicant died on 26 December 2012, while the case was pending before
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0617DEC000585523
17 juin 2025
Its name does not reflect this – the name is noble – the State Security Service ... while in reality, nothing endangers our State, nothing corrupts (ხრწნის) it more than we do!
ECLI:CEDH:002-6442
28 août 2012
The applicant confirmed the statement she had made to the police.
ECLI:CEDH:001-150869
6 janvier 2015
No such inspection had been carried out by the responsible State authority.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1201DEC004342204
1 décembre 2009
For example, while it is essential for the efficacy of the system that Contracting States comply with their obligation not to hinder the applicant in the exercise of the right of individual petition, individuals
ECLI:CEDH:001-123846
12 juillet 2013
Three of them, including the applicant, had second-degree invalidity, while the others were under medication. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0424DEC005514821
24 avril 2025
applicable only after the applicant had lodged the civil action, which was ten months before the start of the proceedings under Law no. 87.