CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

87 résultats pour « Samir BELLASRI »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2166090-2320970

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2007

15 novembre 2007

  Violation of Article 6 § 1 (fairness) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Belasin v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523DEC001668215

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2023

23 mai 2023

On the same date Ü.Y.Y. submitted a short notice of appeal against the judgment. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0919DEC000330724

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2024

19 septembre 2024

In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0120DEC002792107

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2015

20 janvier 2015

  26446/06, 23 June 2009; Bekauri v. Georgia (preliminary objection), no.   14102/02, § 24, 10   April   2012 and Alboreo v.   France (dec.), no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013DEC000473110

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2015

13 octobre 2015

The same enquiries were filed with the prosecution authority by the applicant’s lawyer on 20 November and 25   December 2009, but no reply followed. THE LAW 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0906DEC001931592

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 1995

6 septembre 1995

       Subsequently, the association brought its complaint before the Administrative Court relying in substance on the same arguments as in the Constitutional Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0628DEC004121720

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2022

28 juin 2022

US 289/2021), essentially on the same ground as the complaint of the fourth applicant (lack of the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904DEC001120015

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2018

4 septembre 2018

The same day an extradition detention was ordered, starting as of 16   December 2014. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1123DEC004848413

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2017

23 novembre 2017

In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0227DEC001089624

Admin. suprême

27 février 2025

27 février 2025

In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1007DEC005547320

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2021

7 octobre 2021

In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1110DEC004406620

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2021

10 novembre 2021

In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111DEC005595213

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2022

11 janvier 2022

Court   of   important new developments regarding their pending applications, given that such conduct prevents the Court from ruling on the matter in full knowledge of the facts (see   Bekauri

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0206DEC001059914

Admin. suprême

6 février 2024

6 février 2024

The same applies if important new developments occur during the proceedings before the Court and the applicants fail to disclose that information, thereby preventing the Court from ruling on the case in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001668290

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

  5202, carob and olive grove; share: 1/8; area: 5,686 sq. m; (c) Bellapais, plot no. 52/2, sheet/plan XII/36W2, registration no. 5201, carob and olive grove; share: 1/8; area: 17,392 sq. m; (d) Bellapais

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1212DEC001210486

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 1988

12 décembre 1988

      Beatrix IMHOF, born in 1935, a housewife         residing at Rothenthurm 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121DEC000931924

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2024

21 novembre 2024

24 18/03/2024 (59 applicants) Frigyes Józsefné KERTI 1956 Lászlóné BALLAGÓ 1942 Nóra BERENDI 1952 Árpád BLUHON 1981 Krisztina BLUHON 1973 Klára BOCSÁK 1984 Gyula Lászlóné BODA 1946 Ildikó BODA 1967 Beatrix

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201DEC000894223

Admin. suprême

1 février 2024

1 février 2024

In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120DEC001242021

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2022

20 janvier 2022

fail to inform the Court about new important developments regarding their pending applications given that such conduct prevents the Court from ruling on the matter in full knowledge of the facts (see Bekauri

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0915DEC002829710

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2015

15 septembre 2015

  Bekauri and Ms Ts. Javakhishvili, lawyers practising in Tbilisi. 2.     The Georgian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr L.

Source officielle

Page 3 sur 5

← PrécédentSuivant →