text-align:left } .s7251870C { width:118.74pt; display:inline-block } .s409B8435 { width:168.12pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 52334/13 Eric WRIGHT and James

nationalité Française [Adresse 6] [Adresse 7] Représentant : Me Christophe DEBRAY, Postulant, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 627 - N° du dossier 13000586 Représentant : Me Catherine GOUET

by Mr Tony Fisher, a lawyer practising in Colchester, Mr Philip Leach and Ms Anke Stock of the Kurdish Human Rights Project in London, as well as by Mr   Mark   Muller, Mr Tim Otty and Ms Jane

James Reilly, an Irish citizen, born in 1966, resident in Drogheda, Ireland; 10. Brendan Boyle, an Irish citizen, born in 1969, and resident in Bromley.

He was told that the lump had gone but that he still needed a hospital examination. (b)     Visits from family and friends 24.

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 67537/01 by John James

  On 6th November, 1966, the applicant was arrested in Scotland on suspicion of having murdered in Ireland in October, 1965, one James MacPartland.

A..., avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : B0653 Ayant pour avocat plaidant Me Pierre-Louis B..., de la SELARL FRASSON GORRET, avocat au barreau de PARIS SARL STEFANI & STEFANI

On the contrary any residual insecurity in the child by      reason of any fear that he might be removed from the foster      parents would be gone and the only

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sE70BCCD1 { width:240.91pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 48864/99 by Mark James

It held that the publication of the documents by the applicant had gone beyond her freedom of expression, given the particularities of the armed body to which she belonged.

the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by three United Kingdom nationals, Mr Andrew George McGlinchey, Ms Natalie Jane

These sums of money had subsequently gone to bank accounts of the first applicant company.

If any subscriber could find out whether his telephone was being intercepted or not, then the secrecy which is essential to the successful operation of the system would be gone" (para. 19).

Whereas C. had expressed opinions while remaining within the scope of his duties, A.’s comments had gone beyond what was normal in a situation of that kind.

the applicant’s complaints under Article 8 of the Convention to be “parasitic” upon the first ground being established and did not, therefore, consider that they raised any issues which needed to be gone

By letter of 11 June 2002 the applicant informed the Court that he had appointed Mr Mark Muller, Mr Tim Otty, Ms Jane Gordon and Mr Philip Leach, lawyers practising in the United Kingdom, as well as Mr

Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows:                 THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Spencer James

In an interview with the CSA Mr K alleged that he had stopped paying as two of the qualifying children had been living with him for five years and a third had moved in recently, while the fourth had gone

There must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim pursued (see the James and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98,