TRAMAR [Adresse 4] [Localité 7] représentée et assistée par Me Franck GUENOUX, avocat au barreau de ROUEN COMPOSITION DE LA COUR  : Lors des débats et du délibéré : Mme FOUCHER-GROS,

    On 24 October 2012 and 30 November 2015 the Administrative Court of Lisbon ruled in favour of the first, second, third and fourth applicants.

A second interview was not in dispute, and the applicant signed the note recording his account of his movements on the day of the fourth robbery.

SECTION Application no. 23126/16 Iosif-Amadeus STĂVILĂ against Romania lodged on 18 April 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application originated in the Ineu prosecutor’s office’s decision to reopen

connection with the arbitration proceedings initiated by MOL against Croatia before the ICSID in 2013, in which it was stated that “during the fourth hearing in the arbitration proceedings with MOL, Croatia

The first three applicants live in Blagoevgrad and the fourth applicant lives in Sofia. The applicants were represented before the Court by Mr Y. Yankov, a lawyer practising in Sofia.

1933 and lives in Afipskiy.

The third and fourth applicants live in Kharkiv. 5.

1959 and lives in Bilgorod-Dnistrovskyy.

1975 and lives in Kimovsk, Tula Region.

  4, may, under the fourth paragraph, be subject, in particular areas, to restrictions imposed in accordance with law and justified by the public interest in a democratic society.

    In the light of the above considerations, the Government requested the Court to strike out the third and fourth applicants’ complaints in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention. 21.

  1 were set out in Kopecký v. Slovakia ([GC], no. 44912/98, §§ 35 and 45-52, ECHR 2004-IX), Anheuser-Busch Inc. v.

In this connection it reiterates that future income cannot be considered to constitute “possessions” unless it has already been earned or is definitely payable (see   Anheuser-Busch Inc. , cited above

As a result, couple S. could in practice reside indefinitely in the applicants’ premises.

Foch 22 louait un appartement au ... (16ème), appartement occupé par M.

Inc.’s possible involvement in the project of setting up a network of osteoporosis clinics in Poland.

Following that hearing, the Inner House found in favour of Tods Murray on all three points raised in the appeal. On 27 April 2007 the case was remitted to the Outer House. 20.

    The applicant, Mr Dumitru Buşu, is a Romanian national, who was born in 1941 and lives in Bucharest. 2.

In particular, the court ordered the prosecutor to obtain evidence from experts in psychology, in order to establish the perception skills and personality of S.U . , the main prosecution witness, and to