And the panel of professional judges shall also set aside the jury’s guilty verdict if it finds that ‘insufficient evidence of his guilt has been produced’; see Article 376C.

On 10 April 2007 the jury returned a guilty verdict.

the conclusion that the accused was not guilty.

In the fourth round of the proceedings, a criminal chamber of a different branch of the same first-instance court found the applicant guilty of murder and sentenced him to twenty-five years’ imprisonment

Article 3 Presumption of innocence Member States shall ensure that suspects and accused persons are presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. Article 4 Public references to guilt 1.

  He was found guilty by the central military court, sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment and discharged from the armed forces.

The prosecutor had been convinced of the applicant’s guilt as he had used statements of fact in his speech.

    The applicants claimed that they should have been awarded compensation for unlawful prosecution because they had not been found guilty by any court. 15.

    alleged violation of the applicant’s right to a fair trial (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention), to be presumed innocent until proved guilty (Article 6 § 2 of the Convention) and to respect

before the High Court of Eastern Denmark (Østre Landsret) with rape committed on two occasions in 1963, and, according to the procedure applicable, a jury was set up to determine the question of his guilt

In June 2004 the criminal court found the applicant guilty of unauthorised purchase of drugs as a repeat offender and sentenced him to thirteen years’ imprisonment.

The county court held that the applicant could not be acquitted on account of the evidence against him in the case file, which established his guilt.

Tempel v. the Czech Republic - 44151/12 Judgment 25.6.2020 [Section I] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Case repeatedly remitted to first-instance court for new examination until guilty

of a crime without their guilt having been established according to law. 4.

before he had been proved guilty according to the law.

The Court of Appeal had upheld the conviction but had also found the applicants guilty of the offence of criminal conspiracy, overturning the first-instance judgment on that issue.

In appeals against conviction following a plea of guilty, the somewhat mechanical test of whether a change of plea to guilty was ‘founded upon’ a particular feature of the trial, namely a wrong direction

By judgment of April 1997, the district court found the applicants guilty of financial offences. In June 1998, the Court of Appeal found them also guilty of misusing the company’s assets.

wanted to have them examined in order to clarify the circumstances of the case and to explain the relations between the individuals involved, as well as to contest a witness statement on which their guilt