Georgia , no. 522/04, § 62 and 63, 13 January 2009, and Goginashvili v. Georgia , no.

state of health with his or her continued detention, even if he or she is seriously ill, is contingent on the State’s ability to provide relevant treatment of the requisite quality in prison (see Goginashvili

In this regard, it notes that there already exists a well-established case-law, including against Georgia, concerning lack of adequate medical treatment in prisons (see, for instance, Goginashvili v.

Voskanyan’s transfer to hospital in view of necessary surgical treatment was compensated by this visit arranged by the administration in the detention facility (contrast, mutatis mutandis , Goginashvili

Mrs Nani Goginashvili 6 August 1958 26. Mr Grigol Gabrichidze 1 January 1930 27. Mr Tariel Elizbarashvili 2 January 1940 28. Mrs Nana Giorgobiani 1 March 1960 29.

l’on ne peut en déduire une obligation générale de remettre le détenu en liberté ou de le transférer dans un hôpital civil, même s’il souffre d’une maladie particulièrement difficile à soigner ( Goginashvili

Georgia , no. 522/04, § 62 and 63, 13 January 2009, and Goginashvili v. Georgia , no.

The relevant general principles concerning the adequacy of medical treatment in prisons were summarised by the Court in, among other cases, Goginashvili v.   Georgia (no.

was sufficient for an ill detainee, who wished to complain to the Court of a lack of adequate medical care, to have alerted the relevant domestic authorities about his or her state of health (see Goginashvili

apparently serious deterioration during his detention (see paragraphs 15, 21 and 22 above) does not mean, in itself, that the authorities failed to comply with their positive obligations (see   Goginashvili

Georgia , no. 19634/07, §§   41 ‑ 52, 18   December 2012) as well as case-law concerning lack of adequate medical treatment in prison (see, for instance, Goginashvili v.

Court notes that there already exists a well-established case-law, including those with respect to Georgia, concerning the lack of adequate medical treatment in prison   (see, for instance, Goginashvili

In this regard, it reiterates that there already exists well-established case-law on the issue of the lack of adequate medical treatment in prison (see, for instance, Goginashvili v.

regard, it reiterates that there already exists a well-established case ‑ law, including against Georgia, on the issue of the lack of adequate medical treatment in prison (see, for instance, Goginashvili

    8591/09 GOGNIASHVILI and 15 others v. Russia Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 14, Prot. 1 Art. 1, Prot. 4 Art. 2 41.     8603/09 KAKHNIASHVILI and 15 others v.

    8591/09 GOGNIASHVILI and 15 others v. Russia Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 14, Prot. 1 Art. 1, Prot. 4 Art. 2 41.     8603/09 KAKHNIASHVILI and 15 others v.

    The relevant preventive and compensatory remedies in the context of the healthcare in prison have been described in the case of Goginashvili v.

in the assessment of the adequacy of the treatment, it must be guided by the due diligence test, since the State’s obligation to cure a seriously ill detainee is one of means, not of result (see Goginashvili

Poland , no. 28300/06, §§ 87-88, 20 January 2009 and Goginashvili v. Georgia , no. 47729/08, § 70, 4 October 2011). 52.