Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.

B..., représentés par Me Barbaro, demandent au tribunal, dans le dernier état de leurs écritures : 1°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 25 juillet 2022 par lequel le maire de Nice a refusé de faire droit à leur

display:inline-block } .sDEA786DA { width:210.67pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 32957/96 by Franz, Elisabeth and Georg KÖTTERL and Barbara

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Declares the application admissible; Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention; Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes

At 10.15 a.m. the same day, the applicant was taken to the Barbaros Health Clinic, where a medical report was issued.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention;   3.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 12 December 2002, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The first applicant, Ms Barbara Wieszczek, a Polish national

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention;   2.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Declares the application admissible; Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention; Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes

Holds by eight votes to one that the respondent State is    to pay the applicant, within three months, 2,000,000    (two million) French francs for damage; 4.

It also informed them that should it decide to hold an oral hearing, it would commence at the earliest at the end of October   2000.

Relying on the findings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter, “the CJEU”) in the Barbara Mercredi judgment (see paragraph   28 below), the court found that at the relevant time

    The applicants, Mr   Wiesław Pióro, and Mrs   Barbara Łukasik, are siblings. They are Polish nationals who were born in 1930 and 1933 respectively.

  I therefore hold that Kelly possessed the mens rea for       murder, and I find him guilty of counts 1 and 2 of the murder of       the two soldiers

  On 25 October 1994 the Court decided that in the circumstances of the case it was unnecessary to hold a hearing. AS TO THE LAW 10.

    At 10.15 a.m. the same day, the applicant was taken to the Barbaros Health Clinic, where a medical report was issued.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.

It does not see any reason to hold otherwise. 51.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the length of the proceedings;   2.