CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0908DEC001747315
8 septembre 2015
On 20 February 2011 Y.A. also contacted the Railway Police and made a similar submission.
Page 29 sur 65
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113JUD001068518
13 novembre 2025
Meanwhile, the case file of the investigation – which concerned nearly 30 suspects and included the applicant’s medical history – was made available to the parties to the criminal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116JUD003302317
16 janvier 2024
For instance, the applicant submitted that in the early part of his sentence he made efforts to be active and participate in activities such as sport and attending a distance learning law school
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412JUD003871903
12 avril 2007
Until March 1996 the Shakhty Town Social Security Service (hereafter - the Service) made monthly payments to the son as a compensation for health damage. 6.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113731
6 mai 2011
The third applicant is Ms Valentina Alekseyevna Zhukova, a Russian national who was born in 1956 and lives in the Leningrad Region.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006JUD001598421
6 octobre 2022
: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0618JUD001889919
18 juin 2020
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1107DEC000689724
7 novembre 2024
THE LAW The Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0608JUD005250220
8 juin 2023
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD002851910
8 juillet 2021
On 17 March 2010 the Supreme Court of Ukraine allowed an appeal lodged by E. on points of law and upheld the eviction order made by the District Court.
ECLI:CEDH:001-146927
10 septembre 2014
The applicants further complain under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the reversal of the compensations awards made by the Town Court, which had already been paid to the applicants, violated their right
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620DEC001049618
20 juin 2019
The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0429JUD002763717
29 avril 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422DEC000930219
22 avril 2021
THE LAW Alleged violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention The Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0916DEC001760715
16 septembre 2021
; The Court considers that Mr Ilija Psaltirov (see paragraph 1 above) has the requisite standing to pursue the application on behalf of his late father (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD005939619
1 décembre 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1213JUD002293919
13 décembre 2022
In particular, where an appellate court is called upon to examine a case as to the facts and the law and to make a full assessment of the question of the applicant’s guilt or innocence, it cannot, as a
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1126JUD002856317
26 novembre 2020
applicant’s complaint is admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128DEC004737008
28 janvier 2020
After the failure of attempts to reach a friendly settlement, by a letter of 6 November 2019 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a view to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC002040216
4 juin 2024
Valentini, a lawyer practising in Rome; the decision to give notice of the application to the Italian Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Mr L.