These plots of land were registered as follows (see paragraph 8 of the principal judgment): a)     Nicosia/Piroi, plot no. 124, sheet/plan 31/26, registration no. 4475, share: ½, area: 25,753

The land was divided into two plots measuring, respectively, 1,650 sq. m. (hereinafter, the smaller plot) and 3,350 sq. m. (hereinafter, the larger plot). 10.

The applicants are the owners of a plot of land of 330,000 square metres (plot no. 1416), in the district of Milas, in Muğla.

owned an apartment building on those plots.

It concluded that 1,267 sq. m of the plot that had been allocated to the applicant overlapped with another plot of land owned by a third party. As such, his property certificate had to be revoked. 9.

    Proceedings concerning a different plot of land measuring 11,112   sq.   m 9.

    The applicants claimed that they cultivated and built constructions on the plot.

L., who owned two houses and a plot of land in Vilnius. The land was nationalised in 1940.

On 3 December 2003 the Vilnius City mayor sent a letter stating that the plot of land would be delimited.

That house was situated on a plot of land measuring 0.14323 hectares that was jointly owned by the first applicant and the State (the State apparently owned twelve-thirteenths of the said plot of land)

As a result of this decision the plot no. 70/101 was returned to the applicant.

conditions extérieures et de la vitesse appropriée permettant, dans de telles conditions, de garder la maîtrise de son véhicule par temps de pluie et dans l'obscurité, ne peut éviter, sur une chaussée plate

et d'implantation joints au permis de construire du 11 août 1995 que le terrain est en pente descendante à partir de la voie publique que l'emplacement de parking ne pouvait être accessible que si la plate-forme

the applicant’s plot and adjacent to the boundary of the plot.

    On 25 May 2005 P.S. sold a plot of 0.50 hectares out of the 8.17   hectares given to him to S.M. On 30 June 2005 P.S. sold a plot of 1.27   hectares to Ž.J.

It appears that, despite the fact that the title deeds contained coordinates of each plot of land, the boundaries of the plots had not been established by cadastral survey. 6 .

other plots of lands.

That court, considering that it had not been shown that the construction carried out on the plot had been lawful, ordered the restitution of the land “in actual boundaries”.

The applicants and other persons (“co-owners”) were heirs to a plot of land measuring 7,675 sq. m.