He had only had access to basic anti-fever drugs. The temporary detention facility had not been equipped to accommodate seriously ill detainees.

B... pour 60 ha, 49 a, 59 ca et la commune de Tanaron pour 1 ha, 44 a, 93 ca, que cette mention ne peut s'analyser en trois ventes partielles dont les acquéreurs seraient M. A...

and that he had no claims against the police.

In his last letter, he noted that the applicant had been to the French embassy in Algiers several times but had been told that he could not be issued with a visa unless the appropriate instructions had

It stated in particular that the area zoning plan had been issued in 1981 and had been published in 1982.

For about two   months, he had about 4   sq. m of personal space in these cells. The rest of the time, he had between 2.11 and 3.41 sq. m of personal space.

He has not been seen again by his unit.

COUR DE CASSATION, TROISIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, (Douai, 17 mars 2005), que les époux X... ont donné à bail des parcelles

He then gave his reasons for refusal in the present case: “... the Home Secretary has had particular regard to the likely age of your wife at the time that you will become eligible for release.

Later she said that she had transferred the parcel to Vakha Abdurzakov, in detention in the district military commander’s office, and that “Sergey” and “Volodya” had offered to release him for USD 3,000

[D] [U] et Mme [J] [U] devant le Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles afin de voir : - constater que les défendeurs occupent les locaux, sis [Adresse 2] (parcelle cadastrée n°[Cadastre 1] de la section B)

    The applicant owned two plots of land in Eskişehir, in the Kiğı District of Bingöl, which had been registered in the land register as plot no.   127 and parcels nos. 45 and 46. 5.

    The applicant owned a plot of land in Kınalıada, in the Adalar District of Istanbul, which had been registered in the land register as plot no.   91, parcel no. 5. 5.

The court concluded that the authorities had failed to comply with their own decisions of 1995 and 2002 and the land had still not been transferred to the applicant.

They stated that they had not witnessed an assault and had not received any complaints from the applicant.

de 36 ha 03 a 66 ca dépendant de cette donation ; que M.

, lesdits rémanents attestant de ce que, en leur état initiale les parcelles étaient des parcelles boisées; qu'il n'est d'ailleurs pas contesté que le cadastre portait, en ce qui concerne ces parcelles

The applicants considered that there had been no pressing need for such a reduction and argued that it had been both unfair and discriminatory because it had been selective. -   As to the discrepancy

has not been formalised ...