Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC001038603
16 mars 2010
16 mars 2010
On 19 August 2009 the applicant lodged a motion for deadline. The proceedings are still pending before the Supreme Court. 2. Second set of proceedings (no. P239/95) 8.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126494
30 août 2013
30 août 2013
The representatives of MDM-Bank, who had the status of third party in the proceedings, asked the court to leave the motion without consideration.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0126DEC004017998
26 janvier 1999
26 janvier 1999
On 31 October 1994, the proceedings were adjourned by the District Court of its own motion.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC002709111
15 avril 2014
15 avril 2014
On 8 November 2010 the applicant lodged a motion for reinstatement. 10.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-148116
22 octobre 2014
22 octobre 2014
The applicant challenged the trial judge for bias, which motion was dismissed. On the applicant’s renewed request, the trial judge recused herself.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC000170203
2 octobre 2007
2 octobre 2007
Ten hearings were adjourned on the court’s own motion or because of the absence of the representatives of the defendant company. On 23 May 2001 the court found against the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0922DEC002947407
22 septembre 2015
22 septembre 2015
(e) Motions and exclusion of evidence 19 .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC007715301
13 décembre 2005
13 décembre 2005
Execution proceedings On 30 December 2002 the applicant filed a motion with an executions officer and requested enforcement of the District Court’s judgment of 19 December 2001.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-163503
11 mai 2016
11 mai 2016
He further claims that despite his motion, and before answering it, the investigator obliged the commission of experts to proceed with the forensic examination.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0407DEC001778991
7 avril 1992
7 avril 1992
was nothing to show that the motion had been rejected arbitrarily.
Source officiellePôle 6 - Chambre 6
642e75d28b510604f5bc1e7a
5 avril 2023
5 avril 2023
Il reste néanmoins que la cession de la société au groupe Blue Motion Technologies s'est faite dans le cadre d'une nouvelle procédure de conciliation initiée en juillet 2017.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0601DEC003050096
1 juin 1999
1 juin 1999
there is no hearing, the motion may be made at any time before the initiation of the appellate review.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0704DEC002980896
4 juillet 1997
4 juillet 1997
The judge did not decide during the hearing on the motions challenging him for bias.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114DEC002699995
14 janvier 1998
14 janvier 1998
Further, he submits that the courts failed to give reasons as regards the refusal of his motions challenging the presiding judge for bias.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1017DEC001622190
17 octobre 1991
17 octobre 1991
There had been previous unsuccessful motions to this effect, a number of councillors and pressure groups having campaigned against gaming.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1980959-2096796
24 avril 2007
24 avril 2007
On 24 May 2001, during a Local Council meeting, the applicants tabled a motion calling for a public meeting to be held about the project. The motion was rejected.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-138436
25 octobre 2013
25 octobre 2013
Should this motion be dismissed, he requested that the case be remitted for additional investigation.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109736
8 mars 2012
8 mars 2012
on DVD’s in order to register them and dealing with them (original electronic motions on DVD’s were returned to the applicant in 2006).
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0910REP002676095
10 septembre 1999
10 septembre 1999
s motion and by the District Court's decision to dismiss him. He submitted that certain statements in the motion were incorrect as to the facts.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC006467401
9 juillet 2002
9 juillet 2002
On 2 February 2000 the applicant filed a motion with the Ivanec Municipal Court to indict S.
Source officiellePage 29 sur 351