CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD004167410
25 mars 2021
At the hearing of 26 August 2009, the trial court rejected, without further elaboration, the application to have the search and seizure measure declared inadmissible, on the grounds that the application
Page 29 sur 1853
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD005910208
25 septembre 2012
At the hearing the applicant submitted that a substantial part of the debt had been paid in the meantime. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704JUD005352807
4 juillet 2017
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0118JUD002835908
18 janvier 2022
At a hearing held on 15 November 2006 the applicant gave evidence in person and denied the accusations levelled against him. 14 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0519JUD005561018
19 mai 2020
It relied in this respect on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a]
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0617JUD006702413
17 juin 2021
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125JUD000283610
25 novembre 2021
It relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0327JUD000875316
27 mars 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0303JUD002781817
3 mars 2026
and, in the present case, they had not found it necessary to hold a hearing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0314JUD005737818
14 mars 2023
If such preliminary reference is not made, this will constitute a violation of my right to a fair hearing, as defined in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights ...” 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1114JUD005868917
14 novembre 2024
Relying on Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention, the applicants complained that they had not committed any administrative offence and that they had not had a fair hearing, since the domestic
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118JUD003918211
18 janvier 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0209JUD002248605
9 février 2016
examined in the domestic proceedings, in violation of Article 6 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0304JUD002779416
4 mars 2025
Accordingly, the procedure followed did not enable the applicant to participate properly in the proceedings before the Court of Appeal and thus deprived him of a fair hearing within the meaning
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1011JUD004335307
11 octobre 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0331JUD004380706
31 mars 2015
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1130JUD000185010
30 novembre 2017
The applicants complained that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ failure to properly and timely notify them of hearings in the civil proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0629JUD006344613
29 juin 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0215JUD000289021
15 février 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1127JUD002823012
27 novembre 2025
protection of a right may be rejected on the basis of expiry of the limitation period only where the party in whose favour the limitation period runs has submitted a relevant request before the end of the hearing