GERMANY   The European Court of Human Rights has declared admissible the application lodged in the case of von Hannover v. Germany (no. 59320/00).

Germany , no. 1057/02, CEDH 2004-III (extracts); Information Note no. 63).

children of the family to the father: inadmissible   The first applicant, a German national, left her Canadian husband in 1997.

Germany (dec.) - 66783/01 Decision 2.2.2006 [Section III] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Possessions Refusal to return an estate on the territory of the former German Democratic

delivered on 12 May 1992 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;        Recalling that the case originated in an application against the Federal Republic of Germany

delivered on 21 February 1984 and 23 October 1984 and transmitted the same days to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling that the case originated in an application against the Federal Republic of Germany

The applicant was against his daughter moving to Germany and revoked a declaration he had made before the German Embassy in Lisbon allowing his daughter to travel outside Portugal.

There was a legitimate link for criminal prosecution in Germany, as this was in accordance with Germany’s military and humanitarian missions in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the applicant had resided in Germany

    On the other hand, the applicant had a particularly serious interest in remaining in Germany as he was living, since 2010, with his two minor children who both held German nationality.

The applicant had resided lawfully in Germany only since 16 July 2001, when he was granted a residence permit following his marriage to a German national. b.

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Deputy Agent, Mr H.-J. Behrens, Ministerialrat , of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

Z... est devenu, sur son incitation, le gérant, des prêts très importants à la société Courcelles Barcares dont il est lui-même le dirigeant ; qu'une fois obtenus, ces prêts ont été affectés par ses soins

Mohamed Y... a consenti un contrat de location-gérance à son frère Mohamed X... ; que le 18 décembre 1987, M.

SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Attendu qu'il résulte des énonciations de l'arrêt attaqué (Dijon, 9 septembre 2003), que la société Elf-Antar-France a donné en location gérance

Selon l'arrêt attaqué (Lyon, 28 février 2024), un contrat de location-gérance de station-service a été conclu, le 20 avril 2012, entre la société [W], dont M.

Germany [GC] - 46720/99 Judgment 30.6.2005 [GC] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Deprivation of property Obligation to return to the reunified German State, without compensation

the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 4 August 1989   by Mr Claus Hermann Paul Bacher against Germany

Germany (cited above) and Garcia Cancio v. Germany (cited above). COMPLAINT 11.

    The trial court established the facts of the case on the basis of an initial investigation carried out in Germany by the German authorities.