Article 29 of the Russian Constitution guarantees freedom of expression. 13.

She argued that the court had disregarded her right to freedom of expression.

20574/08, 26817/08, 4762/09, 4770/09, 34055/11 and 69680/11) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Switzerland , cited above, § 144, and Fressoz and Roire v.   France [GC], no.   29183/95, ECHR 1999 ‑ I).

    On 18   October 2017 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint, alleging, inter alia , that his right to freedom of expression had been violated. 13 .

Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)

The Ankara Assize Court concluded that chanting the slogans in question could not be regarded as falling within the scope of the right to freedom of expression. 11.

Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)

    The applicant complained that his conviction and punishment had been in breach of his right to freedom of expression.

    Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.

    Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.

Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)

Section 12 – Freedom of expression and right of access to information Everyone has the freedom of expression.

Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)

Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)

    The applicants complained under Article 10 of the Convention that their convictions for displaying a red star were a breach of their right to freedom of expression. 4.

Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)

  39449/21) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“

xa0; The case originated in an application (no. 6061/10) against the Republic of Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms