Italy , no. 21463/93, §§ 34-46, 11   January 2001; and Edoardo Palumbo v. Italy , no. 15919/89, §§ 33-48, 30   November 2000). 54.

against the Republic of Lithuania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Lithuanian nationals, Mr Eduardas

Turquie , n o 22535/93, § 124, CEDH   2000 ‑ III, et Paul et Audrey Edwards c. Royaume-Uni , n o 46477/99, § 71, CEDH 2002 ‑ II; voir aussi Georgiy Bykov , précité, § 60). 60.

    The Court reiterates that the guarantees in paragraph 3 of Article 6 are specific aspects of the right to a fair trial set out in paragraph 1 (see Edwards v. the United Kingdom , 16 December

against the Kingdom of Sweden lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Swedish national, Mr Robert Edward

by the notion of a “fair balance” that must be struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual’s fundamental rights (see Edwards

Therefore, such measures designed to achieve greater social justice may call for less than reimbursement of the full market value (see, for example, Edwards v.

In so doing, the Court must consider the proceedings as a whole, including the decision of the appellate court (see Edwards v.

principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards

lives of those within their jurisdiction (see, for example, L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom , 9   June 1998, §   36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 ‑ III, and Paul and Audrey Edwards

proceedings before lodging his complaint with the Court, in particular in so far as the outcome might have had a bearing on the Court’s examination of the allegations of ill-treatment (see Paul and Audrey Edwards

2627/09) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Edward

applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   María Elósegui , President ,   Mattias Guyomar,   Kateřina Šimáčková , judges , and Viktoriya

applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal

annexe   ; b)     qu’à compter de l’expiration dudit délai et jusqu’au versement, ces montants seront à majorer d’un intérêt simple à un taux égal à celui de la facilité de prêt marginal

for general measures, under Article 46 of the Convention, to be applied by the Maltese State in order to put an end to the systemic violation of the right of property identified in such cases (see Edwards

applicable at the date of settlement; (b)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal

xa0;   The Court has frequently held that the obligation to investigate, which stems from Articles 1 and 3 of the Convention, “is not an obligation of results, but of means” (see Paul and Audrey Edwards