These delays cannot be attributed to the applicant company’s conduct.

Accordingly, the only issue that remains to be examined concerns the delays in the enforcement of those judgments.

Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Stand for election Lack of time for campaigning due to late registration of candidates in parliamentary elections following initial arbitrary refusals to register them and delays

to formally notify him of their concerns about such delays.

An aggregated delay of approximately two years resulted (see paragraphs 6, 9 and 13 above).

However, neither the delays caused by the applicant’s own conduct nor the delays caused by the Public Prosecutor’s appeals could justify the overall length of the proceedings.

There were no other significant delays attributable to the authorities.

Violation Art. 8 stopping of 17 of the applicant's letters;No violation Art. 8 stopping of the applicant's letter of 30 March 1976 to Mr Stonehouse, MP, and the two day delay in the posting of the applicant's

He avers that the case was not as complex as the Government submitted and that the domestic courts were solely to blame for the delay.

The applicant submitted that such changes where to the detriment of the person whose land had been expropriated and who had been suffering delays in proceedings.

The applicant had directly suffered the consequences of the delay caused by the suspension of all criminal proceedings, a delay that had been prejudicial not only to the legal process but also to the interested

As a result, the State authorities were responsible for a delay of nine months.

The delay in diagnosing the PKU in T.’s case had been partly attributable to the staff of the laboratory.

In particular, they stated that the delays in the proceedings caused by the lengthy forensic examination should be attributed to the Government.

        In September 1993 and again in March 1994 the applicants contacted the court asking why there was a delay in dealing with the application.

She complained about delays in the proceedings before the District Court.

A   series of delays ensued, however. Between 9 June 2011 and 1 December 2011, the applicants sought the adjournment of the case.

Such an inordinate delay in deciding the case cannot be justified by its complexity or the sometimes menacing and unacceptable attitude displayed by the applicant.

of the claim and the delays which have already occurred in the course of the proceedings.