Y..., de la SCP Lyon-Caen, Fabiani et Thiriez, avocat de la Banque de Baecque Beau, venant aux droits de la société Parisienne de banque, les conclusions de M.

et ayant agence Régionale du Sud-Ouest, ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 28 février 1990 par la cour d'appel de Bordeaux (2e chambre, au profit : 1°/ de la société civile immobilière de La Benauge

Florencio Z... né le 11 mai 1995 à TORRALBA DE OROPESA 105 Rue Veuf Thibeauville 80110 MOREUIL Comparant concluant par la SCP TETELIN -MARGUET ET DE SURIREY avoués à la Cour et plaidant par Me POURCHEZ-BEHAGUE

Rabaté, juge des référés ; - les observations de Me Behague, pour la société le clos des vignes, et de Me Garcia, pour la société coopérative de production HLM Marcou, qui persistent dans leurs écritures

and 3   (b); by four votes to three that there had been no violation of Article 6 §§   1 and 3   (d) as regards the complaint concerning the absence of the witness testifying on her behalf

In the absence of a document in which the applicant had indicated that he or she wished the representative to lodge an application with the Court on their behalf, the cases would be rejected for want of

Romania - 40355/11 Judgment 12.1.2016 [Section IV] Article 34 Victim Locus standi of heirs to make Article   3 complaint on behalf of man who died before application to the Court was lodged: victim

They travelled to Russia and stayed there until March 2022 when they left for Belarus with the intention of crossing into and seeking asylum in Lithuania.

In that connection, the applicant argues that the domestic courts interpreted the criterion of “committing an offence on behalf of a criminal organisation” under that provision as including, in particular

At the end of the questioning the judge ordered the applicant’s pre-trial detention on suspicion of making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organisation.

According to some applicants, before being allowed to enter Latvia, they suffered from daily pushbacks to Belarus.

  35653/12 and 66172/12, §§ 56-59, 28 June 2016; and by contrast, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

    International reports on Belarus 55 .

He, however, continued visiting Belarus to take part in its political life.

The applicants were again returned to Belarus. 12.

    On 25 July 2007 the General Prosecutor's Office of Belarus requested the applicant's extradition to Belarus. 13.

After that the applicants had left their home and travelled to Belarus with the aim of travelling onwards to Poland.

In view of the applicants’ relatives’ alleged inability to have contact with the outside world, the present applications were introduced by the applicants on their behalf.

The border guards then summarily turned him away to return to Belarus. 6.