CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503DEC001617304
3 mai 2011
She also submitted that taking into account that company H. had acted in good faith when it constructed the sheds on her land, she required the recognition of a property right over the sheds to accompany
Page 28 sur 1066
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158418
6 octobre 2015
He claimed, inter alia , that the investigation into his daughter’s death had been ineffective in that the investigator had either modified the questions submitted by him or in general had failed to include
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:SO00453
7 mai 2024
La société fait grief à l'arrêt de la condamner au paiement d'une somme au titre des congés payés afférents à l'indemnité compensatrice de préavis, alors « que l'indemnité compensatrice d'un montant égal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC007665701
6 octobre 2009
Moreover, such a system had begun to work in favour of debtors owing compensation for non-pecuniary damage and in favour of insurance companies in particular.
ECLI:CEDH:001-147200
16 septembre 2014
Fellner, a lawyer practising in Zagreb. 2. The applicant in the second case (application no 6234/08), Vegrad DD, is a joint-stock company based in Velenje, Slovenia.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:SO10859
19 octobre 2022
Pietton, conseiller, et Mme Lavigne, greffier de chambre, la chambre sociale de la Cour de cassation, composée des président et conseillers précités, après en avoir délibéré conformément à la loi, a
Cour d'Appel
6253c925bd3db21cbdd87626
31 mars 2005
Elles soutiennent que la copie servile d'un produit et sa commercialisation Ë un prix largement inf rieur caract risent la concurrence d loyale.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1219JUD007384101
19 décembre 2006
The applicant is a limited company registered in Sweden. 6. In 1986 the applicant company sued company X. for breach of contract and requested SEK 609,000 in compensation.
cr
6137256acd5801467741d84a
27 mars 1996
Mais sur le cinquième moyen de cassation, pris de la violation des articles 2, 3, 418, 591 et 593 du Code de procédure pénale; "en ce que l'arrêt du 10 février 1995 a reçu la société Brinter Company
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0420DEC003241196
20 avril 1999
In a contract dated 23 June 1990 and amended in July 1990, the applicant companies had agreed that the first applicant company would furnish the contracted goods, organise the export and indemnify
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216DEC002513094
16 décembre 1999
In the case before us the investigations were carried out, inter alia , into the companies’ accounting and those investigations were time-consuming.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6614
21 septembre 1999
Owners of such land are entitled to compensation but must seek it through the courts. They have five years in which to do so from the day on which the public construction was completed.
ECLI:CEDH:001-144957
19 mai 2014
In his claim H.B. relied, inter alia , on the Decree to state that he had the right to acquire their property.
ECLI:CEDH:001-112517
11 juillet 2012
The Minister rejected the request on 15 July 2009, on the grounds, inter alia , that the applicant’s placement in custodial institutions had been in conformity to the law, that all the necessary court
ECLI:CEDH:002-6288
Following his acquittal, the applicant brought a claim for compensation for the time spent in detention on remand. The claim is still pending.
ECLI:CEDH:001-229722
27 novembre 2023
The applicants complain that despite the explicit provision in Article 107 of the Code of Civil Procedure providing for claimants to bring proceedings without indicating the definite amount of compensation
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0903DEC007658116
3 septembre 2024
The complaint relates to the State’s failure to pay full compensation for the damage the applicant company claimed to have sustained, a situation which was finally resolved by the Serbian courts in 2016
Audience publique de contentieux (1er ETAGE)
69a8216acdc6046d47799fb5
15 juillet 2025
L'argumentation de la SAS INTER V.O FRANCE repose sur un fait établi, la vente par la SAS JEAN & LAYNET à la SAS INTER V.O FRANCE d'un véhicule volé.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0824DEC005876100
24 août 2004
By its judgment of 6 May 1991, the District Court ruled in favour of the applicant’s company, ordering T to pay compensation.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0520JUD006787912
20 mai 2025
In September 2011, the third applicant entered into a sale contract in respect of her flat with Company A and was paid AZN 1,886 per sq. m of her flat – a total of AZN 165,000. 4.