CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904JUD002081512
4 septembre 2018
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation)
Page 28 sur 59589
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0924JUD000150808
24 septembre 2013
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0717JUD000814008
17 juillet 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0312JUD003120605
12 mars 2013
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1-f - Expulsion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003773920
21 janvier 2021
He also complained under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention about excessive length of the judicial review of detention. THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0320JUD004658008
20 mars 2018
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD002934320
15 avril 2021
The applicants complained under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. They also raised complaints under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0721JUD005810414
21 juillet 2016
In application no. 21219/15, the applicant also raised a complaint under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention concerning the speediness of the review of his detention. THE LAW I.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12417
2 avril 2019
Malta - 62676/16 Judgment 2.4.2019 [Section III] Article 5 Article 5-4 Speediness of review Automatic review of immigration detention not held within seven working days as required by domestic law: no
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0318JUD001778916
18 mars 2021
’y aurait pas eu de problème au regard de l’article 5 § 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0612JUD005280510
12 juin 2012
issues under Article 5. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD005815810
6 novembre 2012
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0407JUD002285309
7 avril 2015
He relied on Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which provides: “4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD007532511
10 février 2015
privé de liberté en méconnaissance de l’article 5 §§ 1 et 4 de la Convention et de l’article 1 du Protocole n o 7 à la Convention. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0525JUD002219418
25 mai 2023
The Court reiterates that Article 5 of the Convention is, together with Articles 2, 3 and 4, in the first rank of the fundamental rights that protect the physical security of the individual
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD004122320
27 octobre 2022
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 of the Convention 5. The applicant complained of the deficiencies in the proceedings for review of the lawfulness of his detention.
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-11829
30 janvier 2018
Luxembourg - 18233/16 Arrêt 30.1.2018 [Section IV] Article 5 Article 5-4 Contrôle de la légalité de la détention Absence de recours pour contrôler la révocation d’une libération conditionnelle :
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0709JUD000259217
9 juillet 2019
There has accordingly been a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. IV.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1212JUD003911023
12 décembre 2024
They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904JUD000276509
There has accordingly been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention. II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION A.