As to the GDEA’s order of 29 December 2014, the Court notes that under domestic law the GDEA, as a local executive authority, had no competence to make decisions regarding the expropriation

    By an indictment dated 8 February 2019, the Adana public prosecutor charged the applicant with insulting the President of the Republic, on account of certain posts that she had made on her

[The request has been made on the basis of reasonable grounds] ... to believe that he may be hiding the instrument of the crime – a knife – as well as other items and objects having significance for the

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

xa0; Ann Power, judges, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 April 2006, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Ms Valentina

  9457/06 was lodged with the Court on 5   December 2005 by Ms Valentina Ivanovna Krotova, who was born on 3   July 1942 and lives in Voronezh.

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

They made several applications to the courts to obtain execution of the judgment, and in particular the demolition of the parts of the buildings above the maximum authorised height.

    The applicant did not make any claims in respect of the costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and before the Court. 41.

On various dates the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints.

The request ( təqdimat ) was made by ... R.H. ... ... by bringing Shahla Amiraslanova to this post R.H. has undermined State interests ...” 9.

    The Court notes that the Russian Government have not made any submissions as to the admissibility and merits of applications nos. 862/16 and 40836/15 and have not made any further submissions

    Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 9.

    The applicant did not make any claims in respect of legal costs. There is thus no call for award in that respect.

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

    The Court reiterates that a judgment in which it finds a breach imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation to put an end to the breach and make reparation for its consequences.

The applicant had been detained for a period of one year two months and two weeks in the Satu Mare and Oradea Penitentiaries.

    The catastrophic economic situation in Western Slavonia and the Knin region makes life very difficult for all inhabitants, whether they be Serbian or Croatian.