Justice à PARIS, le trois mai deux mille, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de Mme le conseiller ANZANI, les observations de la société civile professionnelle PIWNICA et MOLINIE, et de Me LUC-THALER

cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 27 novembre 1985 par la cour d'appel de Chambéry, au profit de : 1°) La société à responsabilité limitée LA BOUFFONNERIE, dont le siège est à Val-d'Isère (Savoie), Le Thovex

Thierry X..., demeurant ..., 2 / la Mutuelle du Mans assurances, société d'assurances mutuelels à cotisations fixes, dont le siège est ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 9 avril 1998 par la cour

Grégoire, Thierry, Chartier, Ancel, Durieux, conseillers, M. Savatier, Mme Bignon, conseillers référendaires, M.

that more than eight years had elapsed since then and that he had been subjected for many years, since 2007, to a criminal investigation and court proceedings that had been pursued against him.

  France ([GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999 ‑ V), and argued that it was incumbent on the Government to prove that the remedy in question was effective and available in theory as well as

    However, there is somewhat more force so far as other matters which occurred after the decision in MGN v UK are concerned: they provide some support for the notion that the 1999 Act regime

in open court that it is of that opinion and what the exceptional circumstances are.”

In this connection, they pointed out that according to Slovenian legal theory, a transfer based on “an assignment for the purpose of collection” ( odstop v izterjavo ) was complete, meaning that the transferred

The court may, on an application to that effect, remit the fine if it is satisfied that there was good cause for the non-appearance. THE LAW I.

  m. with air conditioning and which they had not had to share, and that catering and medical care had been provided for her.   The third-party interveners 16.

It appears that the case is currently pending before that court.

An alternative theory put to them was that it was in actual fact more of an ambush than a defensive action.

Article 3 of the Convention additionally requires that an official investigation be conducted even in the absence of an express complaint, if there are sufficiently clear indications that ill-treatment

However, they concluded that the applicant’s son had already been in a critical condition with little chance of recovery when he had been admitted to the Chernivtsi Regional Hospital, and that there had

This remedy was available to them both in theory and in practice as from 1 January 2002 and they should have resorted to it.

they know that all complaints usually pass through the colony's administration'.

    The Court notes that it is open to doubt that these remedies were sufficiently certain both in theory and in practice.

; by 13 votes to four, that there had been a violation of Article 2, in that the investigation into his death was inadequate; by 16 votes to one, that there had been a violation of Article 2, in that the