CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

4 324 résultats pour « Derrendinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC005131410

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

The Court’s position may be subject to review in the future depending, on the domestic courts’ capacity to establish consistent case-law under the Remedy Act in line with the Convention requirements (see

Page 28 sur 217

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111057

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2012

13 avril 2012

According to Article 373 of the Civil Code, the general period for lodging a civil claim is maximum ten years, and can be shorter depending on the type of the claim and the civil-law relations giving rise

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146628

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 2014

1 septembre 2014

During the proceedings against the applicant, several thousand people signed a letter titled “Defending freedom of expression”, which was handed to the Ombudsman on 21 November 2008.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC000919204

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2011

6 septembre 2011

At the hearing held on 12 June 2003, due to the appearance of his state of health, the court had doubts as to whether he was capable of comprehending the charges against him and defending himself in the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC002550411

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

    The applicant further complained that the fairness of the proceedings had been breached as medical reports that had been submitted by the defending party and the Judge Rapporteur’s opinion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12702

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2020

30 janvier 2020

The developments in the case-law had been brought about mainly by applications to the urgent-applications judge made by the OIP in its capacity as an observer of the prison system committed to defending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0204DEC000425469

Admin. suprême

4 février 1971

4 février 1971

November 1969, without giving him the opportunity of defending his case personally. Only a lawyer was appointed for his defence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1019JUD005948721

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2023

19 octobre 2023

If court documents are not duly served on a litigant, then he or she might be prevented from defending him or herself in the proceedings (see   Zavodnik v.   Slovenia , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179699

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2017

1 décembre 2017

Moreover, when defending its rights [the Administrative Centre], as seen from the written objections, essentially justifies all such actions, considering them not to be extremist. ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122DEC000895111

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2016

22 novembre 2016

the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having regard to the comments submitted by the European Centre for Justice and Human Rights and by the Alliance Defending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC001117906

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

;   Under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 taken together with Article 13 of the Convention, the applicant maintained that the domestic court system constituted a wholly inefficient instrument for defending

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0919DEC000127722

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2023

19 septembre 2023

The Court has, however, depending on the circumstances of a case, accepted, for example, that the risk of tampering with evidence existed for some time after the start of the proceedings, at least until

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13292

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2021

8 juin 2021

pagan movements enjoyed any sort of privileged status in their relationship with the State, the Court reiterated that the scope of the States’ margin of appreciation could not be broader or narrower, depending

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-523379-524839

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2002

21 mars 2002

  The present applicant was convicted for having criticised a prosecutor for decisions taken in his capacity as a party to criminal proceedings in which the applicant was defending one of the accused

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-195072

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2019

11 juillet 2019

v) Depending on the answer to the above questions, given that the LAB is obliged to apply the law regulating compensation, was the applicant denied access to court in the determination of her compensation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1114JUD000605723

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2024

14 novembre 2024

If court documents are not duly served on a litigant, then he or she might be prevented from defending him or herself in the proceedings (see   Zavodnik v.   Slovenia , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1202DEC005392721

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2025

2 décembre 2025

However, these vouchers were distributed for the specific year to which they corresponded and their number was limited, depending on the budget allocated by the central administration and the contracts

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1003JUD003766613

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2019

3 octobre 2019

If court documents are not duly served on a litigant, then he or she might be prevented from defending him or herself in the proceedings (see Zavodnik v.   Slovenia , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1112DEC001113184

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 1986

12 novembre 1986

  He concluded in the opinion that the compensation due to the applicants amounted to 21.664.637,- AS or 20.824.769,- AS, depending on certain further criteria.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1120DEC000549718

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2018

20 novembre 2018

    A supervisory-review application is examined by the Supreme Court within two or three months, depending on whether a case-file was requested from a lower court (Article 336 of the CAP). 10

Source officielle