CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC005131410
22 janvier 2013
The Court’s position may be subject to review in the future depending, on the domestic courts’ capacity to establish consistent case-law under the Remedy Act in line with the Convention requirements (see
Page 28 sur 217
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111057
13 avril 2012
According to Article 373 of the Civil Code, the general period for lodging a civil claim is maximum ten years, and can be shorter depending on the type of the claim and the civil-law relations giving rise
ECLI:CEDH:001-146628
1 septembre 2014
During the proceedings against the applicant, several thousand people signed a letter titled “Defending freedom of expression”, which was handed to the Ombudsman on 21 November 2008.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC000919204
6 septembre 2011
At the hearing held on 12 June 2003, due to the appearance of his state of health, the court had doubts as to whether he was capable of comprehending the charges against him and defending himself in the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC002550411
22 janvier 2019
The applicant further complained that the fairness of the proceedings had been breached as medical reports that had been submitted by the defending party and the Judge Rapporteur’s opinion
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12702
30 janvier 2020
The developments in the case-law had been brought about mainly by applications to the urgent-applications judge made by the OIP in its capacity as an observer of the prison system committed to defending
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0204DEC000425469
4 février 1971
November 1969, without giving him the opportunity of defending his case personally. Only a lawyer was appointed for his defence.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1019JUD005948721
19 octobre 2023
If court documents are not duly served on a litigant, then he or she might be prevented from defending him or herself in the proceedings (see Zavodnik v. Slovenia , no.
ECLI:CEDH:001-179699
1 décembre 2017
Moreover, when defending its rights [the Administrative Centre], as seen from the written objections, essentially justifies all such actions, considering them not to be extremist. ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122DEC000895111
22 novembre 2016
the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having regard to the comments submitted by the European Centre for Justice and Human Rights and by the Alliance Defending
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC001117906
17 septembre 2013
; Under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 taken together with Article 13 of the Convention, the applicant maintained that the domestic court system constituted a wholly inefficient instrument for defending
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0919DEC000127722
19 septembre 2023
The Court has, however, depending on the circumstances of a case, accepted, for example, that the risk of tampering with evidence existed for some time after the start of the proceedings, at least until
ECLI:CEDH:002-13292
8 juin 2021
pagan movements enjoyed any sort of privileged status in their relationship with the State, the Court reiterated that the scope of the States’ margin of appreciation could not be broader or narrower, depending
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-523379-524839
21 mars 2002
The present applicant was convicted for having criticised a prosecutor for decisions taken in his capacity as a party to criminal proceedings in which the applicant was defending one of the accused
ECLI:CEDH:001-195072
11 juillet 2019
v) Depending on the answer to the above questions, given that the LAB is obliged to apply the law regulating compensation, was the applicant denied access to court in the determination of her compensation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1114JUD000605723
14 novembre 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1202DEC005392721
2 décembre 2025
However, these vouchers were distributed for the specific year to which they corresponded and their number was limited, depending on the budget allocated by the central administration and the contracts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1003JUD003766613
3 octobre 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1112DEC001113184
12 novembre 1986
He concluded in the opinion that the compensation due to the applicants amounted to 21.664.637,- AS or 20.824.769,- AS, depending on certain further criteria.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1120DEC000549718
20 novembre 2018
A supervisory-review application is examined by the Supreme Court within two or three months, depending on whether a case-file was requested from a lower court (Article 336 of the CAP). 10