Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0206JUD006094600
6 février 2007
6 février 2007
His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 16 May 2000 and was rejected on 19 May 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC001277502
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC001281502
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141890
20 février 2014
20 février 2014
On 12 March 2012 the trial court acquitted the accused because the proceedings had not been initiated by the correct prosecutor in respect of the charges of bodily injury, and because there was insufficient
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021DEC005312207
21 octobre 2008
21 octobre 2008
A hearing scheduled for 14 October 2002 was adjourned because, again, the parties had agreed to settle the case but had failed to do so.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169253
6 novembre 2016
6 novembre 2016
The applicant argued that he wanted to live in Austria with his wife and child; that his wife needed his support due to her pregnancy; and that he could not return to the Netherlands because he would be
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203418
4 juin 2020
4 juin 2020
According to the applicant, because of inadequate treatment, he suffered from more frequent epilepsy seizures.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0412DEC003981098
12 avril 2001
12 avril 2001
The applicant further submits that because of the excessive length of his detention, it could not be considered as a provisional measure, but constituted an anticipatory sentence,
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC007554501
23 octobre 2003
23 octobre 2003
The Government firstly maintained that the applicant had failed to exhaust domestic remedies because he had not submitted a constitutional claim challenging the legislation in question.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017DEC001789108
17 octobre 2017
17 octobre 2017
The sale of the land on 20 January 2005 was also illegal because, according to the law, only land which had previously been leased could be sold and only by a tender.
Source officielle2ème chambre 2ème section
68e94fe23ea43407b910508f
9 octobre 2025
9 octobre 2025
PMI AVOCATs DEFENDERESSES représentée par Maître Thomas RONZEAU de la SCP RONZEAU & ASSOCIES - #P0499 représentée par Me Stéphanie BERNAUD - #D0172 ORDONNANCE DE CLÔTURE Nous, Robin VIRGILE, Juge, juge
Source officielle3ème chambre A
69677c28cdc6046d474114ca
13 janvier 2026
13 janvier 2026
ACORA SUD LOIRE [Adresse 3] [Localité 4] Représentant : Me Maxime BERTHAUD, avocat au barreau de LYON INTIME Nous, Sophie DUMURGIER, conseiller de la mise en état, assistée de Céline DESPLANCHES
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Besançon
ORTA_2201070_20220912
12 septembre 2022
12 septembre 2022
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 17 juin 2022, M. et Mme C et B A, représentés par Me Bechari, demandent au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision du 4 février 2022 par laquelle
Source officielleChambre Commerciale
6162d673a2a5768a176c5577
17 novembre 2011
17 novembre 2011
[N] [E] ès qualités de liquidateur judiciaire de Monsieur [O] [R] [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] défaillant COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DES DEBATS ET DU DELIBERE : Monsieur Jean-Louis BERNAUD
Source officiellesoc
6137234fcd5801467740820b
9 juin 1999
9 juin 1999
l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par : Epoux X..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 24 mars 1997 par la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (9e chambre), au profit de la société Domaine de Bertaud
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0222DEC002426494
22 février 1995
22 février 1995
The trial judge also emphasised the position of the applicant's two co-accused in that considerable delay had already been experienced by them because of the applicant's behaviour to date.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161567
24 février 2016
24 février 2016
Nobody is able to work because he is bribing them [AMD] 5,000. Hunger is a bad thing and poverty is the worst thing in the world.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0405JUD002179112
5 avril 2018
5 avril 2018
In addition, on ten occasions the hearings were adjourned because of applications by the prosecutor or on the court’s own motion, and on nine occasions because the applicant’s applications were granted
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0529DEC000587472
29 mai 1974
29 mai 1974
The investigation of the offenses was difficult because they were cleverly planned and executed and because so many group members took part in them.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326JUD005699816
26 mars 2019
26 mars 2019
the hearing did not take place because the applicant refused to attend because of the conditions of detention in custody.
Source officiellePage 28 sur 1499