Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Chapter 30, Article   3 “The judgment may relate only to an act for which a prosecution was properly instituted or to a matter referred by statute to the court’s criminal jurisdiction.

If that is the case, as a general matter, both parties should be given a chance to be heard.

It informed her of its intention to rule on the matter by 15 August 2011 at the latest.

Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Aleš Pejchal,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Ksenija

, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Guido Raimondi,   Kristina Pardalos,   Linos-Alexandre

    Relying on the expert evidence admitted at the trial, the court established, as a matter of fact, that during the “incriminating event of 26   August 2002 ... Mr   S.

Emberland, Attorney, Attorney-General’s Office (Civil Matters), as their Agent. A.

Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President ,   Ksenija Turković,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,  

    On 18 June 2009 the District Court, on the basis of the Guardianship Service Act, appointed a mentor for the applicant in matters concerning his property and economy, as well as matters pertaining

Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Aleš Pejchal,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Ksenija

European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Romanian national, Mr Alexandru

Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 30 April 2003, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Valentina Pentiacova, Nichifor Avasiloaie, Nicolaie Bugan, Alexandru

It also ordered them to consult each other in any matter concerning the children’s welfare. 8 .     Both parents appealed.

    On 29 November 2016 the High Administrative Court held that it had exclusive jurisdiction to decide on all matters relating to proceedings before the IPC.

Attendu qu'il résulte de l'arrêt attaqué et des pièces de procédure qu'à la suite d'un signalement de l'inspection du travail et à l'issue d'une enquête préliminaire, Mme [AX], alors présidente de l'a