On 28   May 1998 the Oldenburg Regional Court upheld the arrest warrant.

In 2001 the Comrat Prosecutor’s Office initiated a criminal investigation against the applicant on charges of murder and a detention warrant was issued by the Comrat District Court.

In January 1995 the investigating judge in charge of the case ordered his pre-trial detention and issued a warrant for that purpose.

details), and the seizure of the law firm’s computer hard disc and several documents including handwritten notes belonging to the applicant in application no. 10131/24, carried out on the basis of a warrant

On 6 April 2009 the prosecutor applied to the Centru District Court for a warrant for the applicant’s detention in custody.

  The arrest warrant was amended on 18 August 1988.

Law – Article 5 § 1: The applicant did not deny that he had at all relevant times been a person of “unsound mind” and that his mental disorder had been such as to warrant compulsory confinement.

conduct on the part of the applicants, however, those factors alone did not suffice for the impugned protest to fall outside the scope of Article 11 and the applicants’ actions had not been such as to warrant

Law : Article   8 – No search warrant was produced to the applicant during the search of her house and no details were given of what was being sought after.

The search warrant was drafted in such vague terms as to allow the seizure of “any information” pertaining to the offence allegedly committed by the journalist’s source and was issued under the urgent

On 16 June 1999 the Public Prosecutor at the Ankara State Security Court requested the court to issue a warrant authorising the search of the headquarters and branches of the Mazlumder , in order to search

On 8 February 2010 the Düsseldorf District Court issued a warrant for the applicant’s arrest. On 22 March 2010 several co-accused were arrested.

Finally, the arrest warrant did not appear arbitrary.

According to the Government, the arrest warrant was shown to the applicant and its content was made known to her both in Greek and English.

  On 12 May 1980 another warrant of arrest was issued against the applicant's companion who was likewise suspected of fraud.

  The judge issued a warrant of arrest against the applicant stating that there were sufficient reasons to suspect the applicant of having participated in violent acts committed by a crowd of people

On the same day a warrant was issued for his arrest. In a letter of ..

Mr and Mrs Huvig’s home was searched as were their business premises, pursuant to a warrant issued on 14 March 1974 by the investigating judge.

Prior to the execution of this warrant, the procedure was clarified with the authority [the investigating judge].