CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

12 118 résultats pour « Wize »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0414DEC002375294

Admin. suprême

14 avril 1994

14 avril 1994

Having appeared for interrogation, the wife had allegedly again been arrested and detained for a short period of time.

Source officielle

Page 27 sur 606

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169570

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2016

17 novembre 2016

It noted the conflict of interests between the applicant, who sought to divorce his wife and evict her from his apartment, and his wife, who sought to deprive the applicant of legal capacity and avoid

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC006533401

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2001

7 juin 2001

The applicant and his wife were married in 1992 and had two children, both born in 1995. The applicant’s wife died on 9 July 1998.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD006618009

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2021

6 juillet 2021

    On 13 July 2008 the applicant’s wife gave birth to a son. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0219DEC001585389

Admin. suprême

19 février 1992

19 février 1992

It referred to the report established by the police according to which the applicant's wife had told a female police officer how the applicant had treated her.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110DEC005807700

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2005

10 novembre 2005

Furthermore, his former wife and mother-in-law had expressed their displeasure at his contacts with his daughter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0213DEC002346203

Admin. suprême

13 février 2007

13 février 2007

In August 2000 the applicant and his wife separated permanently and she and the three children returned to Germany.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126DEC001528608

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2010

26 janvier 2010

On 20 December 2004 the Karlovy Vary District Court issued an interim measure awarding the applicant’s wife custody of the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0602DEC002706705

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2009

2 juin 2009

The first applicant’s wife joined the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0308DEC001759590

Admin. suprême

8 mars 1994

8 mars 1994

  In March 1984 the applicant's marriage was dissolved;   in May 1984 the applicant's former wife requested division of certain matrimonial property.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC002697007

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2009

6 octobre 2009

The applicant and his wife had three children together, who were born in 1997, 1999 and 2001.

Source officielle
TA

1ère chambre

DTA_2301287_20251002

Administratif

2 octobre 2025

2 octobre 2025

Celui-ci faisait notamment état de l’existence de deux entreprises en joint-venture, les sociétés Langfang Castel-Changyu Wine Co. Ltd. et Yantai Changyu-Castel Wine Château Co.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114722

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2012

24 octobre 2012

With decision of 3 March 2009 the FOM revoked the asylum granted to the applicant because he was sentenced for a crime (the killing of his wife).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0217DEC002962809

Admin. suprême

17 février 2015

17 février 2015

A few hours later, during which time the applicant, his wife, daughter and another relative F.D. who had also been travelling in the car were asked to stay next to the car, a warrant was issued by the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7146

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2000

19 septembre 2000

The applicant’s ex-wife continued to oppose any access to the children.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706DEC002353005

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2010

6 juillet 2010

The applicant's wife died on an unspecified date before August 2002.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157495

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2015

2 septembre 2015

Police officers took the applicant and his wife to the police station and put them in different rooms.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0531DEC000507671

Admin. suprême

31 mai 1972

31 mai 1972

In the proceedings before the Commission he was represented by his wife, Mrs. X.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0310DEC001440488

Admin. suprême

10 mars 1989

10 mars 1989

  The applicant's wife made a request for a visa to join her husband in Sweden and for a residence and a labour permit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208729

Admin. suprême

19 février 2021

19 février 2021

  1 that the Russian military alone and/or in cooperation with the South Ossetian military units set up a barbed wire fence “border” along the applicants’ village, dividing their lands, resulting

Source officielle