CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0414DEC002375294
14 avril 1994
Having appeared for interrogation, the wife had allegedly again been arrested and detained for a short period of time.
Page 27 sur 606
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169570
17 novembre 2016
It noted the conflict of interests between the applicant, who sought to divorce his wife and evict her from his apartment, and his wife, who sought to deprive the applicant of legal capacity and avoid
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC006533401
7 juin 2001
The applicant and his wife were married in 1992 and had two children, both born in 1995. The applicant’s wife died on 9 July 1998.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD006618009
6 juillet 2021
On 13 July 2008 the applicant’s wife gave birth to a son. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0219DEC001585389
19 février 1992
It referred to the report established by the police according to which the applicant's wife had told a female police officer how the applicant had treated her.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110DEC005807700
10 novembre 2005
Furthermore, his former wife and mother-in-law had expressed their displeasure at his contacts with his daughter.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0213DEC002346203
13 février 2007
In August 2000 the applicant and his wife separated permanently and she and the three children returned to Germany.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126DEC001528608
26 janvier 2010
On 20 December 2004 the Karlovy Vary District Court issued an interim measure awarding the applicant’s wife custody of the child.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0602DEC002706705
2 juin 2009
The first applicant’s wife joined the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0308DEC001759590
8 mars 1994
In March 1984 the applicant's marriage was dissolved; in May 1984 the applicant's former wife requested division of certain matrimonial property.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC002697007
6 octobre 2009
The applicant and his wife had three children together, who were born in 1997, 1999 and 2001.
1ère chambre
DTA_2301287_20251002
2 octobre 2025
Celui-ci faisait notamment état de l’existence de deux entreprises en joint-venture, les sociétés Langfang Castel-Changyu Wine Co. Ltd. et Yantai Changyu-Castel Wine Château Co.
ECLI:CEDH:001-114722
24 octobre 2012
With decision of 3 March 2009 the FOM revoked the asylum granted to the applicant because he was sentenced for a crime (the killing of his wife).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0217DEC002962809
17 février 2015
A few hours later, during which time the applicant, his wife, daughter and another relative F.D. who had also been travelling in the car were asked to stay next to the car, a warrant was issued by the
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7146
19 septembre 2000
The applicant’s ex-wife continued to oppose any access to the children.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706DEC002353005
6 juillet 2010
The applicant's wife died on an unspecified date before August 2002.
ECLI:CEDH:001-157495
2 septembre 2015
Police officers took the applicant and his wife to the police station and put them in different rooms.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0531DEC000507671
31 mai 1972
In the proceedings before the Commission he was represented by his wife, Mrs. X.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0310DEC001440488
10 mars 1989
The applicant's wife made a request for a visa to join her husband in Sweden and for a residence and a labour permit.
ECLI:CEDH:001-208729
19 février 2021
1 that the Russian military alone and/or in cooperation with the South Ossetian military units set up a barbed wire fence “border” along the applicants’ village, dividing their lands, resulting