The applicant company then sought to start administrative court proceedings. It noted that it had had no procedural status in the administrative case no.

In the meantime, while his registration was pending, on 4 October 2010 several posters containing the applicant’s photograph, biography and his alleged electoral platform were hung on walls of various

must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what

At the start of the hearing in the Assize Court the Advocate-General stated that he wished to file a number of documents concerning events that had occurred when the accused had been a minor, as evidence

Court notes that having regard to the overall length of the proceedings, the relevant complexity of the case, the applicant’s conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while

However, the three witnesses were questioned in Georgia by the defence lawyers after the start of the trial and sent written statements to the court retracting their earlier testimony.

The individual concerned attempted to flee while opening fire on the soldiers and, after an exchange of gunfire, he was fatally wounded.

The State should therefore have taken appropriate measures to prevent or, at least, contain the violence. However, that had not been done.

He pointed out that until 2006 he had been in prison and after that had had no revenues, that previously he had taken a bank loan due to be repaid, and that all his assets had been frozen at the start

must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what

According to the applicant, on 12 March 2014, while he was sitting in a café, he was caught up in a police intervention in a demonstration and when he complained to the officers about his exposure to tear

must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what

THE LAW The Government submitted that the applicant, while lodging the application on 16 January 2021 about poor conditions of his detention in the Mykolayiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility, had failed to

on the part of State officials.

Moreover, while it should be noted that the judgment in the applicant’s favour remains unenforced, this was on account of the existence of an objective impossibility thereto, in particular in view of the

The applicant company was thereby deprived of effective legal representation, while the NTRC, contrary to what the Government claimed, was legally represented.

The court observed that the statements of the sole eyewitness were contradictory in parts and that they included her personal interpretation of what had actually taken place on the relevant morning.

K while her husband was asleep under the influence of drink. 13.

-dze asked the three kidnappers what they wanted. One of them said that, to start with, he wanted to know what they had in their pockets. L.B.