CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD001892509
20 septembre 2018
It has also not been proven that he acted with gross negligence when making the statement.
Page 27 sur 3453
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12098
27 septembre 2018
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD005668716
29 juin 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD004357112
8 juillet 2021
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0429JUD002763717
29 avril 2021
Everyone has the right to respect for his private ... life ... . 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0429JUD006679917
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD002925518
9 mars 2021
The court did not examine the applicant’s complaint concerning a violation of his right to respect for his private life and his payment for his own deportation. 27 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0724JUD004319010
24 juillet 2018
Moreover, the elements of the offence of abuse of office against private interests had not been met.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1028JUD002053106
28 octobre 2014
What must be proved beyond any doubt is the journalist’s bad faith which, in the current case, has not been proved.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0613JUD003078218
13 juin 2024
D’Ascia; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 21 May 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1116JUD007328413
16 novembre 2021
inadmissible the remainder of the application; the parties’ observations; the decision to reject the Government’s objection to examination of the application by a Committee; Having deliberated in private
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD004154213
14 décembre 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD007435413
30 janvier 2020
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0918JUD002101010
18 septembre 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD006361411
sitting as a Committee composed of: Darian Pavli, President, Dmitry Dedov, Peeter Roosma, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0117JUD002968316
17 janvier 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0709JUD002963422
9 juillet 2024
the application (Rule 41 of the Rules of Court); the parties’ observations; the decision to reject the Government’s objection to examination of the application by a Committee; Having deliberated in private
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD000736105
15 janvier 2013
There may in addition be positive obligations inherent in ensuring effective “respect” for private or family life.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000744612
24 juillet 2014
A private prosecutor ( privatni tužitelj ) was an injured party who brought a private prosecution in respect of criminal offences for which such a prosecution was expressly allowed by the Criminal Code
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD005819516
24 octobre 2024
The general principles concerning the lawfulness of search and seizure measures in the context of the right to private life have been summarised in Vinks and Ribicka v.