CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

69 049 résultats pour « Privel »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD001892509

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2018

20 septembre 2018

It has also not been proven that he acted with gross negligence when making the statement.

Page 27 sur 3453

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12098

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2018

27 septembre 2018

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD005668716

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2021

29 juin 2021

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD004357112

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2021

8 juillet 2021

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0429JUD002763717

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2021

29 avril 2021

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private ... life ... . 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0429JUD006679917

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2021

29 avril 2021

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private ... life ... . 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD002925518

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2021

9 mars 2021

The court did not examine the applicant’s complaint concerning a violation of his right to respect for his private life and his payment for his own deportation. 27 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0724JUD004319010

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2018

24 juillet 2018

Moreover, the elements of the offence of abuse of office against private interests had not been met.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1028JUD002053106

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2014

28 octobre 2014

What must be proved beyond any doubt is the journalist’s bad faith which, in the current case, has not been proved.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0613JUD003078218

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2024

13 juin 2024

D’Ascia; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 21 May 2024, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1116JUD007328413

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2021

16 novembre 2021

inadmissible the remainder of the application; the parties’ observations; the decision to reject the Government’s objection to examination of the application by a Committee;   Having deliberated in private

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD004154213

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2021

14 décembre 2021

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD007435413

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2020

30 janvier 2020

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0918JUD002101010

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2014

18 septembre 2014

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD006361411

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2021

8 juillet 2021

sitting as a Committee composed of:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0117JUD002968316

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2019

17 janvier 2019

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0709JUD002963422

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2024

9 juillet 2024

the application (Rule 41 of the Rules of Court); the parties’ observations; the decision to reject the Government’s objection to examination of the application by a Committee; Having deliberated in private

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD000736105

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2013

15 janvier 2013

There may in addition be positive obligations inherent in ensuring effective “respect” for private or family life.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000744612

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2014

24 juillet 2014

A private prosecutor ( privatni tužitelj ) was an injured party who brought a private prosecution in respect of criminal offences for which such a prosecution was expressly allowed by the Criminal Code

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD005819516

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2024

24 octobre 2024

    The general principles concerning the lawfulness of search and seizure measures in the context of the right to private life have been summarised in Vinks and Ribicka v.

Source officielle