Summary of the facts   The applicant has been in detention since 23 December 1993.

No contemporary medical record of this treatment has been submitted.

In his witness statement M.D. had confirmed that he had contacted the bishop by phone to discuss the possibility of an amicable solution, but that no agreement had been reached.

CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le vingt-six mai deux mille quatre, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller CORNELOUP, les observations de Me HAAS

On 15 March 2001 the applicant addressed to the Court a new letter to which he had attached a Court’s letter dated 9 February 2001 which had been addressed to him.

    The applicant complained that the expropriation of her flat had had no basis in law and had served no public interest, and that no adequate compensation had been provided to her.

SYLEX 444 rue Paradis 13008 MARSSEILLE représentée par Me Jean-pascal BENOIT, avocat au barreau de MARSEILLE COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL : Président : Mélanie HAK Greffier : Karine PASCAL DÉBATS : Audience

    The applicants had a plot of land in Yenimahalle, in the Merkez District of Şırnak, which had been registered in the land register as plot no.

Moreover, no consideration had been given to the passage of time when determining compensation, thus breaching the applicants’ property rights. 10 .

had not provided him with any redress.

He stated inter alia that the applicant ought to have noticed the drug parcels in the bag as he had requested Mr K to provide clothes and had subsequently put them into the bag.

    The applicant was the owner of a plot of land in the municipality of Castelpagano, recorded in the land register as folio no. 30, parcels nos.

The police had ignored their complaints and the reports of victims.

The value of those parcels of land and sums of money exceeded the total value of the inheritance that the applicants had received in the restitution proceedings. 2 .

after 29   November 2005, had not been reasonable; the courts had not been independent and impartial, they had failed to hear the applicant in person and had not considered his claim properly. 7.

Her son had not complained for fear of reprisals. The Court has first to determine whether the applicant has exhausted domestic remedies.

Before reaching that decision, he had heard evidence from the applicant and had had access to his prison files, including the medical file.

G., who submitted that she had learned from Sh. that the applicant and the victim had had a quarrel over the lost money and that Sh. had seen the applicant throw the victim through the window. -  

upheld your complaint and has made a number of related recommendations.