CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410DEC004246816
10 avril 2018
On 25 March 2015 the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court partly allowed the applicant’s claim.
Page 27 sur 1230
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006DEC001468303
6 octobre 2005
The present case concerns the strip-searches carried out on 4 February 2003, 10 February 2003, 5 March 2003, 12 March 2003, 20 March 2003, 18 April 2003, 24 April 2003, 28 April 2003, 1 May
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1025JUD005508013
25 octobre 2018
The reporting doctor confirmed the findings of the report by the Parma General Hospital authorities of 19 March 2014 in terms of the applicant’s neuro-cognitive situation, which he described as seriously
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1112DEC003739004
12 novembre 2009
On 13 March 1998 the District Court formally recognised that the applicant and her late sister were related.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0510DEC007293201
10 mai 2005
However, at that time, the Constitutional Court lacked jurisdiction to draw any legal consequences from the finding. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0525DEC003360296
25 mai 2000
1991 and 1 September 1995, the bailiff made 22 attempts to recover possession, on 1 March 1991, 19 April 1991, 29 May 1991, 28 November 1991, 28 January 1992, 5 March 1992, 17 April 1992, 26 May 1992,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0525DEC003192396
1994, 2 March 1995, 15 September 1995, 6 March 1996, 18 September 1996, 6 March 1997, 18 September 1997, 5 March 1998 and 16 September 1998.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0916DEC001511822
16 septembre 2025
On 5 March 2018 the Administrative Court declared his appeal inadmissible, finding that none of the conditions provided in the Administrative Disputes Act under which an appeal is allowed had been fulfilled
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0601DEC003866597
1 juin 1999
On 6 March 1996 the court held a subsequent hearing.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-121015
16 mai 2013
On 30 March 2011 the Zadar Municipal State Attorney’s Office informed the second applicant that on the same day it had, concerning the incident of 1 February 2011, indicted I.M. before the Zadar
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2164907-2319021
13 novembre 2007
On 4 March 2002 Centru District Court, finding that the delay in payment of compensation was the ministry’s responsibility, partly accepted the applicant’s claim and ordered the bank to pay MDL
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-108091
2 décembre 2011
Based on the findings of ECtHR in this case, The Ministry of Interior has adopted "Guidelines in relations with the media".
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD004476908
20 septembre 2018
The beginning of his sentence was to be calculated from 2 March 2008.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1127JUD001732304
27 novembre 2008
On 27 March 2003 the POC’s investigator refused to institute criminal proceedings in respect of the applicant’s complaints, finding, in particular, that the injuries sustained by the applicant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0209JUD003535508
9 février 2017
BULGARIA (Application no. 35355/08) JUDGMENT ( Just satisfaction ) This version was rectified on 21 March 2017 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court
ECLI:CEDH:001-122600
18 juin 2013
On 27 March 2007 the Constitutional Court, having regard also to F.H.’s submissions to it dated 21 March 2006, dismissed the applicant’s constitutional complaint (file no. StGH 2006/16).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0311DEC002590620
11 mars 2025
On 22 March 2017 the Zagreb Municipal Civil Court dismissed the applicant’s claim.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC005070218
22 janvier 2019
Denmark (dec.), no. 52620/99, 20 March 2003, and Albayrak v. Turkey , no. 38406/97, § 32, 31 January 2008). 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905DEC000638315
5 septembre 2023
29656/07, § 64 , 5 March 2019). 21.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1163266-1207246
2 novembre 2004
On 5 March 2001 a doctor found that it could not be excluded that the applicant’s condition was the result of torture.