CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1025JUD003825803
25 octobre 2007
It dismissed the alleged violation of the applicant's right to privacy, holding: “The complaint does not provide grounds for overturning the ruling of the Court of Appeal ( kan niet tot cassatie leiden
Page 27 sur 28
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103JUD002877005
3 novembre 2011
Division rejected the further appeal, holding: “What has been raised in the grievances does not provide grounds for quashing the impugned ruling ( kan niet tot vernietiging van de aangevallen uitspraak leiden
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1126DEC003716417
26 novembre 2019
insufficient interest in the cassation appeal ( klaarblijkelijk onvoldoende belang heeft bij het cassatieberoep ) or because the complaints obviously cannot succeed ( klaarblijkelijk niet tot cassatie kunnen leiden
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0411JUD005776619
11 avril 2023
take away from the fact that it may be expected of you as an adult male that you will be able to build a new life for yourself [ verwacht mag worden dat u als volwassen man in staat moet zijn een nieuw leven
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC000840606
27 mai 2014
On 22 March 2006, an armed bank robbery took place in the town of Leiden. The robber was captured on camera and recognised as one T.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1003JUD001273810
3 octobre 2014
The Administrative Jurisdiction Division found that the appeal did not provide grounds for quashing the impugned ruling ( kan niet tot vernietiging van de aangevallen uitspraak leiden ).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD006837717
25 février 2020
A.S.N. and Others v. the Netherlands, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Jon Fridrik Kjølbro, President, Faris Vehabović, Paul Lemmens
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1965:1213DEC000198363
13 décembre 1965
Among the documents submitted by the Applicant's lawyer, there is an expert report, dated ... 1963, in which Professor A of the University of Leyden gives, for the information of the Minister of
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1021REP001537589
21 octobre 1993
, the movable property found on Atlas' premises, including the concrete mixing machine, was seized (bodembeslag) on the order of the Collector of Direct Taxes (Ontvanger der Directe Belastingen) in Leiden
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0323DEC003825803
23 mars 2006
The Supreme Court held: “The complaint does not provide grounds for overturning the ruling of the Court of Appeal [ kan niet tot cassatie leiden ].
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0119JUD000220516
19 janvier 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0202DEC000434069
2 février 1971
diseases of the applicant, permanent active and passive physiotherapy was necessary in order to keep in action the still active muscles and to prevent their becoming atrophied ("... bei dem stattgehabten Leiden
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD002909409
5 juillet 2016
Where it concludes that the further appeal does not provide grounds for quashing the impugned ruling ( kan niet tot vernietiging van de aangevallen uitspraak leiden ), the Administrative Jurisdiction Division
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD000313816
2 juin 2020
the Administrative Jurisdiction Division found that the applicant’s further appeal did not provide grounds for quashing the impugned ruling ( kan niet tot vernietiging van de aangevallen uitspraak leiden
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710JUD001431917
10 juillet 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0910DEC000231410
10 septembre 2013
further appeal on summary grounds, holding: “What has been raised in the grievances ... does not provide grounds for quashing the impugned ruling ( kan niet tot vernietiging van de aangevallen uitspraak leiden
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004977315
The further appeal was found not to provide grounds for quashing the impugned ruling ( kan niet tot vernietiging van de aangevallen uitspraak leiden ).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204DEC001273810
4 décembre 2012
The Administrative Jurisdiction Division found that the appeal did not provide grounds for quashing the impugned ruling ( kan niet tot vernietiging van de aangevallen uitspraak leiden ) and that, having
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0224DEC002504394
24 février 1997
denen sich die Regierungen der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland bei der Lösung der anstehenden Vermögensfragen leiten
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630DEC002590702
30 juin 2005
Poland, cited above, § 159 and Matthies-Lenzen v. Luxembourg , no. 45165/99, (dec.), 14 June 2001).