CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0330JUD006029700
30 mars 2004
On 16 January 2002 the Supreme Court appointed the Tatabánya Labour Court to deal with the case. 23. On 12 March 2002 the Labour Court heard the parties.
Page 27 sur 320
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0226DEC003155205
26 février 2008
The applicant appealed against the decision to the National Labour Market Board (Arbetsmarknadsstyrelsen) , which upheld it by decision of 2 June 2005.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0706DEC003295596
6 juillet 2000
question which does not concern a labour market dispute.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1202REP002608394
2 décembre 1997
Provision of Labour Act 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC002552503
14 février 2006
available on the labour market to fill the vacancy.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0828JUD000406207
28 août 2012
On 26 May 2005 the Court of Cassation quashed the Labour Court’s decision of 21 September 2004.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0702DEC002909695
2 juillet 1998
On 24 January 1990 the Supreme Court (Legfelsobb Bíróság), finding that there was bias on the part of the Tatabánya Labour Court, appointed the Gyor Labour Court (Gyori Munkaügyi Bíróság) to proceed with
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002487794
16 octobre 1996
The first and second applicant have been working as consultants in labour matters since 1978 and 1977 respectively.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1104DEC005956500
4 novembre 2003
Labour law proceedings On 3 August 1992 the applicant brought an action against her employer before the Budapest Labour Court contesting the findings in the board’s minutes and claiming compensation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1211DEC002555302
11 décembre 2006
In June 1942 he was transferred to the east front, where he carried out forced labour for the German army.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179383
14 novembre 2017
applicant’s failure to “defend his labour rights” before them.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-121789
30 avril 2013
a joint statement of 17/07/2000 between a number of countries, including Poland, the Federal Republic of Germany, the United States and Israel with the aim to compensate victims of slave and forced labour
civ3
61372293cd580146773fea7b
19 décembre 1995
Laboure, demeurant ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 8 novembre 1993 par la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (1ère chambre civile - section A), au profit de la Société de gestion immobilière Vasnier
cr
61372590cd5801467741ed09
24 novembre 1993
décret du 8 janvier 1965, ne prévoit pas l'obligation pour le chef d'entreprise d'établir un plan d'hygiène et de sécurité avant la première intervention des ouvriers de son entreprise concernée ; que laCour
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC002853395
28 février 1996
The Labour Court held an oral hearing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1202DEC002016592
2 décembre 1992
in Labour Disputes (lagen om rättegången i arbetstvister), i.e. in the District Court (tingsrätten) or in the Labour Court (arbetsdomstolen).
Conseil d'État
CETAT:CETATEXT000007642232
11 février 1970
AGRICULTURE - REMEMBREMENT FONCIER AGRICOLE - ATTRIBUTIONS - COMPOSITION DES LOTS - CLASSEMENT DES TERRES PAR NATURE DE CULTURE - Equivalence par nature de culture [article 21 du Code rural] - Classement des labours
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0224DEC002893495
24 février 1997
Provision of Labour Act According to S. 1 para. 1 of the Provision of Labour Act (Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz), an employer, who, on a professional basis
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0917JUD001446411
17 septembre 2015
Labour Court of Appeal (no. 2 AZR 177/02).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1202DEC001207522
2 décembre 2025
Article 6(3) § 1 (on the adopting of labour agreements) of the Labour Code, as it stood at the material time, read as follows: “If a labour agreement has been in force for more than