Hence, the   periods of enforcement amount respectively to twelve and twenty-one months.

Hence, the complaint concerning the inability to obtain legal recognition of the relationship raised a serious issue in terms of the principle of the paramountcy of the child’s best interests and the right

Hence, the disciplinary proceedings against the applicant had not concerned the determination of a criminal charge within the meaning of Article   6, and that Article was therefore not applicable

The Court hence sees no reason to call into question the Stuttgart Regional Court’s assessment of the facts (compare for the relevant principles in that regard also Tuskia and Others v. Georgia , no.

Hence, it is only the decision of the latter court and the language it used (see paragraphs 10-11 above) which is subject to the Court’s scrutiny in the present case. 24.

The public prosecutor, who acted on behalf of the bank, attended the presidium's deliberations and hence could inuence its conclusions. 3.

Hence, it is impossible to assess the degree of harm caused by each of them taken separately, especially as each of them, taken separately, had eventually been a source of traumatic shock, and in particular

had also been given each time for the benefit of the reader, with the result that it could not be argued, as the appellate court had done, that some passages could be attributed to the journalist and hence

  Hence, the Court of Appeal’s conclusion amounted to an acknowledgement of the fact that the applicant had been subjected to a deprivation of liberty contrary to Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (

Hence the difference of treatment for the purposes of the grant of inheritance tax exemptions was reasonably and objectively justified for the purposes of Article   14.

  The Court noted that since the statements had been made in an interview with a journalist, and hence outside a parliamentary chamber, they had not been connected with the performance of parliamentary

Hence, the decisions under which the property had been taken over by the State were illegal.

Hence the Court made no award under this head.

However, the inventory of the bonds had never been completed, and hence these figures could not have been known.

Hence, the proceedings as a whole had been attended by sufficiently strong safeguards and had not been unfair. Conclusion : no violation (unanimously).

The applicant could not use toilet for 5 hours, hence he had to urinate in a plastic bottle while in full view of other detainees.

The court found that the applicants could still exercise their easement rights as before and hence no economic interest for the claim existed. The applicants appealed.

Hence, it was apparent that the objectives actually promoted and put into practice by the members of these associations, including on various occasions by violent means, indisputably contained elements

Hence, the fact that the two applicants had not been present during the questioning did not of itself amount to a violation of Article 6 §§   1 and 3   (d).