CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1218JUD005175616
18 décembre 2025
On 25 June 2014 the Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan (“the District Court”) notified the parties, including H.B., of the proceedings and the date of the preliminary hearing
Page 27 sur 1853
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0623JUD004095919
23 juin 2022
The applicants complained that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ failure to properly and timeously notify them of hearings in the civil proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0702JUD001598911
2 juillet 2019
before the Court of Appeal could not be admitted in evidence unless they had had the opportunity to confront A.B. in a court hearing and address questions to him.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0225JUD002778106
25 février 2014
Moreover, in the determination of criminal charges, hearing the defendant in person should nevertheless be the general rule.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1025JUD003703703
25 octobre 2016
The Code of Criminal Procedure 1960, as in force at the material time, read as follows: Article 18 Publicity of hearing In all courts hearings shall be public, save for when this may endanger
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112JUD001805410
12 novembre 2013
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Public hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1023JUD000540912
23 octobre 2018
In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing ... by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021JUD002512906
21 octobre 2014
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD007646212
23 octobre 2025
The applicants complained that the interference caused by the retrospective application of Law no. 183/2010 to pending proceedings had affected their right to a fair hearing under Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1211JUD005325619
11 décembre 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD003175114
27 octobre 2022
relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0318JUD000669620
18 mars 2025
At the end of the hearing, the trial court ordered the release of eleven of the twelve defendants. 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0905JUD000981510
5 septembre 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0409JUD005925213
9 avril 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0609JUD008027813
9 juin 2020
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0709JUD006770514
9 juillet 2020
that, in view of the circumstances of the case, a hearing would not be justified. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD007743512
22 avril 2021
The relevant part of Article 6 § 1 provides: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ...”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0713JUD004363917
13 juillet 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614JUD001210005
14 juin 2016
#xa0; 6 of the Convention, which relevant part reads as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD004020923
22 janvier 2026
alleging that the domestic courts have failed to observe specific procedural safeguards laid down in that Article or that the conduct of the proceedings as a whole did not guarantee the applicant a fair hearing