Nazaryan’s life had been taken intentionally. Any allegation that he had been murdered would thus be purely speculative.

In the present cases, as soon as the applicants had lodged their complaints, a criminal investigation had been conducted and the matters complained of had been referred to an investigating judge or a trial

Law – Article 5 § 1: The applicants had been arrested on suspicion of throwing Molotov cocktails. The investigating authorities had had material evidence of their guilt.

During that period, which had been decisive for the outcome of the proceedings, the applicant had remained isolated in the children’s home and, moreover, had been deprived of contact with his family for

The applicant had been fully involved in the proceedings, she had been assisted by a lawyer, and had had her case examined at three levels of jurisdiction.

They had had to alter their conduct significantly to reduce the risk of facing further penalties under the Act, which, however, had not stopped the authorities from issuing further fines while they had

    Mr M. had seen Mr I. after he had been blown up but he had not noticed any injuries.

; nor that the applicant had had violent intentions when he had joined the demonstration.

The conflict he had had with the company's administration gave further reasons to doubt his motives. However, the authorities had not verified the information he had provided.

access to natural light or air, and that during the first forty days he had had no opportunity to exercise.

As a junior officer, she had not had much experience and had had to frequently consult M.T. (see paragraphs 50 in fine and 54 below).

. and had been informed that the doctor had been busy.

criminal cases had been opened consecutively, and that was exactly what had happened in criminal cases nos. 2 to 4.

Subsequent investigative steps had been taken and the investigating judge’s conclusions had provided serious indications that a crime had been committed.

Notwithstanding, the impugned article had not alleged that there had been any direct link between N.H. and H.S., or that H.S. had played any role in the election campaign.

applicant had argued that he had intended to (further) expose and discredit views held by D.

They had first targeted the applicant's clan. They had had no information regarding the names of the persons who had participated but had acted arbitrarily and arrested a large number of young men.

The applicant had refused his advances and had asked him to leave. P. had persisted in kissing her while she had tried to push him back.