CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

13 830 résultats pour « Guilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0401DEC006916901

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2004

1 avril 2004

  266-A, pp.15-16, §   30), it considered that only a decision which, following the accused's acquittal, expressed the view that he or she was guilty could violate the presumption of innocence

Source officielle

Page 27 sur 692

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177840

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2017

19 septembre 2017

On 5 July 2011 the Ohrid Court of First Instance found both the captain and the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced them to a year’s imprisonment each (the most lenient sentence available for that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1114DEC002214720

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2024

14 novembre 2024

He was found guilty of simulating a robbery with the specific aim of terminating the pregnancy of his mistress. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512DEC001489904

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2005

12 mai 2005

On 6 December 2000 the Moscow City Court found Mr P. guilty of espionage under Article 276 of the Criminal Code and sentenced him to twenty years' imprisonment in a high-security colony.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0615DEC004348698

Admin. suprême

15 juin 1999

15 juin 1999

Article 556 “Anyone … who resists an order of the authorities or their officers, or is guilty of serious failure to obey them in the exercise of their duties, shall be liable to a prison sentence of six

Source officielle
CC

comm

6079d6829ba5988459c5b9f5

Cassation

21 juillet 1975

21 juillet 1975

COMMERCE EN DATE DU 29 JUIN 1971 A DECLARE QUE LA VENTE A CREDIT PAR LA SOCIETE HELARY, AUX DROITS DE LAQUELLE SE TROUVE LA SOCIETE DE DIFFUSION DE MATERIELS INDUSTRIELS ET D'ENTREPRISE (SODIME) A GUILLOIQUE

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD004410113

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2020

10 décembre 2020

made by public authorities, and judicial decisions, other than those on guilt, do not refer to that person as being guilty.

Source officielle
CC

comm

613724cfcd580146774188ee

Cassation

5 décembre 2006

5 décembre 2006

cour d'appel n'a pas donné de base légale à sa décision au regard de l'article 1134 du code civil ; 2 / que la société Studiocanal n'avait communiqué aucune pièce justifiant avoir payé à la Writers' Guild

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-186593

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2018

5 septembre 2018

At the hearing he fully admitted his guilt and stated that his wife, the second applicant, and their two minor children were Russian nationals and that his removal from Russia would disrupt his family

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110656

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2012

22 mars 2012

The appeal court provided a detailed account of evidence showing that the applicant was guilty of murder and unlawful deprivation of liberty.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016DEC000603315

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2018

16 octobre 2018

The latter pleaded not guilty without explaining why he had earlier confessed to the crime.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-204265

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2020

9 juillet 2020

On 4 February 2009 the Yerevan Criminal Court found the applicant’s co-accused H., Z., V. and S., guilty of M.’s murder.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1964:0702DEC000212264

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 1964

2 juillet 1964

  During the investigation, which was not completed until April 1964, the Applicant denied his guilt, but fully co-operated with the authorities in their efforts to examine and trace the transactions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208738

Admin. suprême

19 février 2021

19 février 2021

There is no intimation of the applicant’s guilt or otherwise in the text”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0828DEC004245698

Admin. suprême

28 août 2001

28 août 2001

Failure to mention such a fact at that time cannot, on its own, prove guilt, but depending on the circumstances, you may hold that failure against him when deciding whether he is guilty, that is, take

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0326JUD000826978

Admin. suprême

26 mars 1982

26 mars 1982

Adolf of any finding of guilt and thus the presumption of his innocence is no longer called into question.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927JUD002327207

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2011

27 septembre 2011

of a criminal offence until his guilt has been established by a final court judgement.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0609DEC001925204

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2009

9 juin 2009

On 5 March 2002 the applicant was found guilty of committing an offence punishable under the 1993 Customs Act and was fined MKD   10,000.

Source officielle
TA

Vice-président Contentieux sociaux

DTA_2200208_20231011

Administratif

11 octobre 2023

11 octobre 2023

Le CCAS de Guilliers, après avoir mis en demeure M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0126DEC001475503

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2006

26 janvier 2006

The applicant appealed against the decision averring that the case-file contained no proper evidence of his guilt.

Source officielle