CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

861 résultats pour « Alexandre FARELLY »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD004721507

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2013

14 mars 2013

    On an unspecified date in June 2001 the first applicant and the A. family allegedly managed to talk to a serviceman from the Western Zone Alignment.

Page 27 sur 44

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131JUD007810314

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2019

31 janvier 2019

    10 to 18 January 1993, after being accompanied to the HSC by the police who had been called to his home following a family dispute.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1117JUD004772407

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2016

17 novembre 2016

On 21 February 2007 the local municipal authorities assigned the flat to Yo. and her family under the social housing agreement. 45.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0301JUD007824113

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2018

1 mars 2018

In the case of Selami and Others v the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0605JUD003376105

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2014

5 juin 2014

    Limitations on family visits 41.     Between January 2004 and March 2005 the applicant received visits in the remand centre from his mother, K. 42 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0219JUD007545012

Admin. suprême

19 février 2015

19 février 2015

    On 29 October 2012 the applicant went to see her family doctor complaining of severe lower-back pain.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1204JUD000806712

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2014

4 décembre 2014

Moreover, he was distanced from his family.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD004152610

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2012

24 juillet 2012

On 14 July 2009 a visit of the family was carried out and only Dalibor was found; he did not know where his mother was and also said that the children had not teased him lately.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001608290

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001609490

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

The applicant lied when asked for details concerning the members of her family.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1121DEC003454797

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2000

21 novembre 2000

:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 34547/97 by Alexander

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0519DEC006295400

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2005

19 mai 2005

Panciu (the eighth applicant), born in 1940; Stoica Răducanu (the ninth applicant), born in 1952; Emilian Niculae (the tenth applicant), born in 1963; Călin Ion (the eleventh applicant), born in 1928; Alexandru

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC003030513

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

SECTION DECISION Application no. 30305/13 Ana SRŠEN against Croatia   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 22   January 2019 as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127DEC007837517

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2018

27 novembre 2018

However, he did not think he could fairly make that assumption. 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001665490

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0219JUD006695309

Admin. suprême

19 février 2015

19 février 2015

Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117JUD003708703

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2020

17 novembre 2020

Having regard to the close family ties and the heirs’ legitimate interest in pursuing the applications, the Court accepts that the deceased applicants’ heirs may pursue the applications in their stead

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD006526719

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2026

22 janvier 2026

    The National Dublin Unit submitted a take-charge request under the Dublin III Regulation (Regulation (EU) No. 604/2013), seeking family reunification with the applicant’s aunt residing in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0208JUD006225019

Admin. suprême

8 février 2022

8 février 2022

There were no neighbours or other family members nearby to offer support. 6 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD001352718

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2021

20 mai 2021

The applicant had only told them how he missed his family. A.A. heard that a day or two before the incident the applicant’s child had fallen ill so the applicant had been worried about that. 26.

Source officielle