CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD004721507
14 mars 2013
On an unspecified date in June 2001 the first applicant and the A. family allegedly managed to talk to a serviceman from the Western Zone Alignment.
Page 27 sur 44
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131JUD007810314
31 janvier 2019
10 to 18 January 1993, after being accompanied to the HSC by the police who had been called to his home following a family dispute.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1117JUD004772407
17 novembre 2016
On 21 February 2007 the local municipal authorities assigned the flat to Yo. and her family under the social housing agreement. 45.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0301JUD007824113
1 mars 2018
In the case of Selami and Others v the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0605JUD003376105
5 juin 2014
Limitations on family visits 41. Between January 2004 and March 2005 the applicant received visits in the remand centre from his mother, K. 42 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0219JUD007545012
19 février 2015
On 29 October 2012 the applicant went to see her family doctor complaining of severe lower-back pain.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1204JUD000806712
4 décembre 2014
Moreover, he was distanced from his family.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD004152610
24 juillet 2012
On 14 July 2009 a visit of the family was carried out and only Dalibor was found; he did not know where his mother was and also said that the children had not teased him lately.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001608290
22 septembre 2009
The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001609490
The applicant lied when asked for details concerning the members of her family.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1121DEC003454797
21 novembre 2000
:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 34547/97 by Alexander
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0519DEC006295400
19 mai 2005
Panciu (the eighth applicant), born in 1940; Stoica Răducanu (the ninth applicant), born in 1952; Emilian Niculae (the tenth applicant), born in 1963; Călin Ion (the eleventh applicant), born in 1928; Alexandru
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC003030513
22 janvier 2019
SECTION DECISION Application no. 30305/13 Ana SRŠEN against Croatia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 22 January 2019 as a Chamber composed of: Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127DEC007837517
27 novembre 2018
However, he did not think he could fairly make that assumption. 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001665490
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0219JUD006695309
Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Isabelle Berro, President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Linos-Alexandre
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117JUD003708703
17 novembre 2020
Having regard to the close family ties and the heirs’ legitimate interest in pursuing the applications, the Court accepts that the deceased applicants’ heirs may pursue the applications in their stead
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD006526719
22 janvier 2026
The National Dublin Unit submitted a take-charge request under the Dublin III Regulation (Regulation (EU) No. 604/2013), seeking family reunification with the applicant’s aunt residing in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0208JUD006225019
8 février 2022
There were no neighbours or other family members nearby to offer support. 6 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD001352718
20 mai 2021
The applicant had only told them how he missed his family. A.A. heard that a day or two before the incident the applicant’s child had fallen ill so the applicant had been worried about that. 26.