However, he was unable to see a doctor immediately, because it was night. 2.     The Government’s version of events 15.

He also alleged that the criminal proceedings had been unfair, because his conviction had been based on unlawfully planted evidence. 4.

The Austrian newspapers reported on these events because U.W. kept them regularly informed and sought publicity. 13.

They also said that there were no grounds for instituting a criminal investigation, as the house had exploded because of a gas cylinder or a landmine.

Because of that, Y owed the applicant RUB 6,000 which she was unable to repay.

No award was made in respect of pecuniary damage because no claims had been made under this head, nor was an award made in respect of costs and expenses because they had not been substantiated. 13.

Many hearings were adjourned in late 2001 and 2002 because the presiding judge was involved in other proceedings or was on leave.

The criminal proceedings against him were terminated because of his death. 12.

    A hearing scheduled for 23 April 2007 was adjourned because the applicant had not been properly summoned. 24.

Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President ,   Ksenija Turković,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,  

The original judgment thus became final. 13.

Benoît DEVIGNOT, Conseiller Ces magistrats ont rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : Monsieur Olivier BEAUDIER, Président de chambre M.

He maintained that he had been demoted because of his involvement in high-profile investigations. 28.

In the applicant’s view, this was contradictory because title under Article 12B was dependent on title acquired under the principal Article 12 of the Ordinance.

On 3 December 2006, he died and the application was continued by his son Mr Alexandru Leonard Panaitescu. A.

After her release the applicant became aware that her hospitalisation had been authorised by a court and appealed against the judgment of 16 May 2005.

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Päivi Hirvelä,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, &#

The Centre explained that supervision was necessary because criminal proceedings for domestic violence were pending against the applicant (see paragraphs 43-46 below) and because psychiatric assessment

Respected colleagues, for you that was a new source of law and a ‘legal basis’ for making an unlawful [decision] ..., which you adopted and which I will continue to challenge because it was not adopted